Evolution at the crossroads

An article at MSNBC about the future of evolution, completely out in left field. You WON'T get it straight if you think Darwin's theory is OK. Please! You can't imitate an evolution you have never seen and the evidence of evolution in history ought to be a warning of wrong thinking here.

The first priority is to get clear on Darwin's incorrect theory of natural selection, and to see the way it produces misleading projections into the future. We have no real idea of how man's evolution occurred. Putting that into the straightjacket of Darwnism is going to produce some wildly confused ideas about how to proceed on the basis of expecting the past to be like the future. These projections are wacko. Check out the material on history and evolution at http://eonix.8m.com/

By Alan Boyle
Science editor
MSNBC
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7103668/

Scientists are fond of running the evolutionary clock backward, using DNA analysis and the fossil record to figure out when our ancestors stood erect and split off from the rest of the primate evolutionary tree.
But the clock is running forward as well. So where are humans headed?
Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins says it's the question he's most often asked, and "a question that any prudent evolutionist will evade." But the question is being raised even more frequently as researchers study our past and contemplate our future.
Paleontologists say that anatomically modern humans may have at one time shared the Earth with as many as three other closely related types — Neanderthals, Homo erectus and the dwarf hominids whose remains were discovered last year in Indonesia.