02.27.06
Selection and Speciation
Every time an ounce of evidence comes in favoring Darwinism, we suddenly hear that the theory has NOT been confirmed. Here is an interesting example: New evidence that natural selection is a general driving force behind the origin of species. What else, given their methodology, could they discover but natural selection? This completely begs the question of some more complex process also at work.
Interesting, nonetheless. See also Panda’s thumb
I am always wary of these new findings.
What Darwin did in his revolutionary treatise, “On the Origin of Species,†was to explain how much of the extraordinary variety of biological traits possessed by plants and animals arises from a single process, natural selection. Since then a large number of studies and observations have supported and extended his original work. However, linking natural selection to the origin of the 30 to 100 million different species estimated to inhabit the earth, has proven considerably more elusive.
In the last 20 years, studies of a number of specific species have demonstrated that natural selection can cause sub-populations to adapt to new environments in ways that reduce their ability to interbreed, an essential first step in the formation of a new species. However, biologists have not known whether these cases represent special exceptions or illustrate a general rule.
The new study – published online in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences – provides empirical support for the proposition that natural selection is a general force behind the formation of new species by analyzing the relationship between natural selection and the ability to interbreed in hundreds of different organisms – ranging from plants through insects, fish, frogs and birds – and finding that the overall link between them is positive.
“This helps fill a big gap that has existed in evolutionary studies,†says Daniel Funk, assistant professor of biological sciences at Vanderbilt University. He authored the study with Patrik Nosil from Simon Fraser University in British Columbia and William J. Etges from the University of Arkansas. “We have known for some time that when species invade a new environment or ecological niche, a common result is the formation of a great diversity of new species. However, we haven’t really understood how or whether the process of adaptation generally drives this pattern of species diversification.â€
The specific question that Funk and his colleagues set out to answer is whether there is a positive link between the degree of adaptation to different environments by closely related groups and the extent to which they can interbreed, what biologists call reproductive isolation.
Dov Henis said,
April 2, 2008 at 10:30 pm
“Natural Selection Speeds Up Speciation”,
Is Science Catching Up With Us?
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=14988&st=180&#entry328692
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=14988&st=150&#entry310150
A.
Darwin and UBC: natural selection speeds up speciation
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-04/uobc-dtu033108.php
B.
physorg forum and Dov Henis: Culture Is Biology, It Imprints Genetics And Drives Evolution
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=14988&st=165&#entry323376
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=14988&st=165&#entry316631
“By plain common sense it is therefore culture, the ubiqitous biological entity, that drives earth life evolution.”
“Eventually it will be comprehended that things don’t just “happen”, “mutate” randomly in the base-prime organism, genome, constitution; the capability of the base-prime organisms to “happen” and “mutate” is indeed innate, but things “happen” and “mutate” not randomly but in biased directions, affected by the culture-experience feedback of the second level multi-cell organisms (or the mono-cell communities).”
Dov Henis
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q–?cq=1