History, Evolution, and The Darwin Debate

Darwiniana header image 2


March 14th, 2006 · No Comments

Paul Gross tells us Darwin’s theory is distinguished by evidence. The Eonic Effect shows clear evidence of evolutionary directionality, witout a design argument, but unfortunately scientists, so-called, haven’t the slightest interest in evidence.

Methodological naturalism — and science — are about evidence. “Truth” without evidence is a philosophical bauble. Contra Teilhard de Chardin and other cited teleologists, there is no evidence for intelligent design in the origins of species. When and if somebody finds it, it will be a part of science. So far there is no evidence.

Tags: Evolution

0 responses so far ↓

  • There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.

Leave a Comment