04.29.06
Closing of the Western Mind
Finished reading: The Closing of the Western Mind : The Rise of Faith and the Fall of Reason (Vintage) (Paperback)
by Charles Freeman >>the author has an interesting ’self-review’ at Amazon.
This is an important argument: the way in which the triumph of Christianity ’shut down’ the tradition of Hellenic rationality. Secularists will read this, but not Christians, who might benefit from the depictions of the beginning moment of the theological apparatus used to brainwash even to this day. Get Pharyngula to explain it to you.
However, it is worth reading this in conjunction with the following:
The End of the Past : Ancient Rome and the Modern West (Revealing Antiquity) (Paperback)
by Aldo Schiavone
This book opens with the oration of Aristides, and explores the way in which Roman society had reached a kind of climax/dead end beyond which there was no further potential to advance.
Taken in context, we can see that the ‘receivership’ of the Christians in the deadlocked and terminal Roman system was, behind its deadening effect, paradoxically the way to another alternate future, a new potential.
From Publishers Weekly
Freeman repeats an oft-told tale of the rise of Christianity and the supposed demise of philosophy in a book that is fascinating, frustrating and flawed. He contends that as the Christian faith developed in the first four centuries it gradually triumphed over the reigning Hellenistic and Roman philosophies. Christianity’s power culminated when Constantine declared it the official state religion in 312. Freeman points to Ambrose, the bishop of Milan, as the figure who showed Constantine that the bishopric could wield power over the state. From then until the Middle Ages, Freeman argues, the church ruled triumphant, successfully squelching any challenges to its religious and political authority. Yet Freeman (The Greek Achievement) fails to show that faith became totally dominant over reason. First, he asserts that Paul of Tarsus, whom many think of as the founder of Christianity, condemned the Hellenistic philosophy of his time. Freeman is wrong about this, for the rhetorical style and the social context of Paul’s letters show just how dependent he was on the philosophy around him. Second, Freeman glosses over the tremendous influence of Clement of Alexandria’s open embrace of philosophy as a way of understanding the Christian faith. Third, the creeds that the church developed in the fourth century depended deeply on philosophical language and categories in an effort to make the faith understandable to its followers. Finally, Augustine’s notions of original sin and the two cities depended directly on Plato’s philosophy; Augustine even admits in the Confessions that Cicero was his model. While Freeman tells a good story, his arguments fail to be convincing. 16 pages of illus. Not seen by PW, 1 map.
Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information, Inc. –This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.From Booklist
Freeman is a well-known scholar of ancient Greece and Rome, and in this provocatively titled work he directs his encyclopedic knowledge of the classical world at its relationship with early Christianity. Specifically, he’s interested in the consequences for Greek rationalism when Constantine turns the faith into a religion of insiders, rather than outsiders; the closing of the Western mind is Rome’s deliberate persecution of those whose God is the noble syllogism. His claim is not so much that Christians wouldn’t listen to reason but that they weren’t tolerant of reasoned dissent–in other words, that the classical tradition didn’t simply waste away but was suffocated by a consolidated church and its ritual, which some would consider irrational superstition. In advancing this claim, his exploration of early Christian attitudes toward Jews, science, and sex are particularly illuminating, as is his perspective on Islam as preservers of Aristotle. Freeman is clearly a little mournful about the loss of logic until Thomas Aquinas, but the product of his frustration with the early church–this book–is simply too impressively erudite to dismiss as polemic or, indeed, to set down. Brendan Driscoll
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved –This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.