05.20.06
Darwinian beffuddlement
Darwinists constantly prattle about science, but then just as constantly confuse, cripple, and propagandize any attempt
to clarify the issues.
History, Evolution, and the Darwin Debate
Posted in Evolution at 8:04 pm by nemo
Darwinists constantly prattle about science, but then just as constantly confuse, cripple, and propagandize any attempt
to clarify the issues.
Design by Beccary and Weblogs.us · XHTML · CSS
Cedric Katesby said,
May 22, 2006 at 12:44 am
So the guy with the mike says “My question is for the two scientists on the panel. Um. Basically I’m wondering if you can discuss um the collision probability of basically uh let’s give something with a very high Stokes-Einstein diffusion coefficient, let’s say a hydrogen atom, two hydrogen atoms, um in a primordial soup on the order of ten to the ninth cubic kilometers and then extrapolate that to the complexity of three billion base pairs, two hundred thousand genes, forty thousand proteins, and discuss your calculation within the context of the entropic contribution to the free energy of this process.”
General audience reaction (including scientists) is “HUH?!?!”
When called upon to restate his question, he says ”
“I’m asking for someone to put a single-celled organism into a test tube, it doesn’t even have to be ten to the ninth cubic kilometers, the volume of the primordial soup, put it in a test tube and make a human out of it.”
This is ‘clarifying the issues’?
Spouting a lot of babble that’s been cut and pasted from the Internet doesn’t clarify anything.
What the guy’s ‘question’ had to do with the topic of evolution is unknown.
He had the mike.
He had the opportunity to say something interesting.
Yet he chose to expose his ignorance.