11.24.06

Lineage of ID terms

Posted in Evolution, Philosophy at 6:01 pm by nemo

Changing terminology

Because there is no rigorous theory of ID, there is a good degree of plasticity associated with the concept. I view, and have always viewed, Intelligent Design as a part of a larger teleological viewpoint that extends back to the Ancient Greeks.

That plasticity is the source of hopeless confusion that is doing more to discredit ID than anything else.

Sit down with a Schopenhauer book. Would you use ‘ID’ to speak of the ‘World as Will’?

Leave a Comment