Posted in Evolution at 3:23 pm by nemo
Darwin’s Angel: An Angelic Response to the God Delusion
THIS BOOK IS A PIECE of sheer heaven. It kicks Richard Dawkins’s self-aggrandising polemic, The God Delusion, into touch with featherlight footwork and is deliciously wise, witty and intellectually sharp into the bargain.
John Cornwell’s mouthpiece is a likeable seraph, who follows the dictum of G. K. Chesterton that angels fly “because they take themselves lightly”. Cornwell clearly believes, as I do, that angels are not wispy, winged beings in ethereal nightgowns, but something far more subtle and profound: archetypal images that dramatise the invisible realities. As such, they can act as symbols for the formless elements of physics; but also for the creative imagination.
Permalink
Posted in Evolution at 3:16 pm by nemo
Hitchens in God is Not Great says ‘human species is, biologically, only partly rational’
Two extravagancies: to exclude reason, to admit only reason. Pascal
Religion man-made? Yes, but… It’s not that simple. If we look at the question of religion in the context of the eonic effect, we see its connection to historical evolution, with a macro component a that.
Read the rest of this entry »
Permalink
Posted in Evolution at 3:03 pm by nemo
State Board will not back the teaching of intelligent design
Texans who believe that public school classrooms should teach science and not religion should be bolstered by the majority of the State Board of Education who, according to a survey taken by the Dallas Morning News, says they won’t back teaching of intelligent design to Texas schoolchildren.
Read the rest of this entry »
Permalink
Posted in Evolution at 3:00 pm by nemo
Unmoved mover
In a nutshell, without the Aristotle
This, in a nutshell, is the insuperable problem with random mutation, and natural selection, so far as they are taken not as factors in an evolutionary development, but as the determinants of it. There is simply more to nature than that. You may grasp this by looking into the eyes of any animal (Redmond O’Hanlon advises against trying this with a gorilla), or at the lilies of the field, that neither toil nor spin. They are purposeful. They are not purposeless.
Time and again it is said that the “God thesis” is not proven, while Darwin’s thesis is supported by an immense accumulation of biological research. But read almost any current biology text, and you will find that after ritual obeisance to Darwin and Darwinism in prefatory remarks, the rest of the book hardly mentions them, and the author(s) will keep slipping into the irresistible vocabulary of design, while trying to communicate how an organism works. Res ipsa loquitur, as we say in Latin. (“The thing speaks for itself.”)
Permalink
Posted in Evolution at 5:51 pm by nemo
From Spoof: Insects Contribute DNA to Human Evolution
Don’t eat me - I’m a superior being! Murphy, North Carolina (IP) - University of Murphy’s Law scientists reported an astounding discovery to the rest of the world this morning. They claim that insects contribute DNA to human evolution via saliva donations. The “donations” take place when cockroaches nibble on a piece of food left out on the counter over night and thus leave a small deposit of their own saliva and other body fluids on the food.
Another method is when roaches crawl in and out of a person’s mouth while they sleep with their mouth open. This is said to occur to everyone at least 88 times during their life times. We all will accidentally swallow a number of flies and gnats during our life times.
Permalink
Posted in Evolution at 5:46 pm by nemo
The Great Bacterial Mashup
Wolbachia is a prolific parasite, having carved out a niche for itself in some 70 percent of all invertebrate animals. But it’s doing more than living in their cells: it’s changing their very DNA in a way that could affect how scientists study genetics and evolution across the animal kingdom.
While analyzing genetic material taken from fruitflies, scientists at the University of Rochester and the J. Craig Venter Institute noticed that quite a few Wolbachia genes awere mixed in.
Permalink
Posted in Evolution at 5:43 pm by nemo
Evolution in Texas — On the Death Penalty
The Nation — There are many Americans who do not believe in evolution. And it is probably fair to say that a disproportionate number of them reside in Texas.
But it is from Texas that we gain confirmation of the absolute certainty that human evolution is a reality.
When George Bush was governor of Texas in the 1990s, he approved executions with impunity, sending to death those who might have been innocent and those who might have been guilty, those who had repented and those who had not, those who had adequate representation and those whose lawyers slept through the trials, those who had the mental capacity to understand their crimes, those whose mental state would have barred even a trial in more civilized jurisdictions.
Permalink
Posted in Evolution at 9:00 pm by nemo
I find it hard to believe that a smart fellow like Hitchens doesn’t harbor secret doubts about Darwinism. After a spell of enthusiastic conversion it suddenly dawns on people that Dawkins is either deluded or a con man, but one able to pied piper adolescent minds. As years go by…
Hasn’t disillusion reached Hitchens yet?
Christopher Hitchens and Bill Donohue on Mother Teresa
Hardball with Chris Matthews
Reposted from:Dawkins site
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tz8GTs1MISY
Permalink
« Previous entries