02.29.08
Posted in religion at 7:26 pm by nemo
From Dawkins site
Leaving the Faith
BigThink.com, Ayaan Hirsi Ali
See many more videos like this at:
http://bigthink.com
Leaving the Faith: Ayaan Hirsi Ali went from political Islam to apostasy. How has her attitude toward the religion changed?
http://www.bigthink.com/features/284
More videos by Ayaan:
http://www.bigthink.com/user/ayaan-hirsi-ali
Videos by Sam Harris:
http://www.bigthink.com/user/sam-harris
Permalink
Posted in Evolution at 4:25 pm by nemo
Hucklebird revies The Design Matrix:
The following is my Amazon review of Mike Gene’s “The Design Matrix.” Enjoy!
Sincerely, Stephen
—————–
The Middle Way
Is there a middle way between the design inference and natural causation? Between teleology and non-teleological evolution? Mike Gene’s “The Design Matrix” gives an affirmative answer to these questions.
Read the rest of this entry »
Permalink
Posted in Science & Religion at 4:21 pm by nemo
From David Sloan Wilson: Atheism as a Stealth Religion V: Ineffective, Silly, and Worse
Sacred texts such as the Bible say so many things that almost any position can be supported by selecting the right passages. So it is with scientific hypotheses. In Stealth III, I listed six plausible scientific hypotheses about the nature of religion. If we are allowed to pick and choose among them, we can support almost any position. If we regard religion as destructive, we can call it a delusion or like the flame that fatally attracts the moth. If we admire religion, we can call it a group-level adaptation that in its purest form promotes universal brotherhood.
Permalink
Posted in Evolution at 4:08 pm by nemo
Podcast series on evolution-intelligent design controversy
Submitted by greenmue on Fri, 2008-02-29 07:40. Topic: bioscience and medicine education and outreach
The Missing Link - a monthly podcast on the history of science, medicine and technology - has just launched a three-episode series on the fascinating history behind the evolution-intelligent design controversy.
Episode 8, just posted at http://missinglinkpodcast.com, begins the series with an investigation into how the nature of scientific method has changed over the centuries. Discover at just what point science invented rules that creationism could not follow.
Future episodes will consider topics like Jewish and Catholic responses to the evolution-ID controversy, why the creationism movement waned in the immediate postwar period in America, and how the very word “evolution” might be inadvertently fueling the controversy.
Find more information at http://missinglinkpodcast.com
Permalink
Posted in Science at 4:04 pm by nemo
February 20, 2008
The Cholesterol Con–Where Were the Doctors? Part I
After the stock market bubble burst, the New York Times asked: “Where were the analysts? Why didn’t they warn us?”
Read the rest of this entry »
Permalink
Posted in you've got mail at 3:08 pm by nemo
_______________________________
UPDATE FROM THE
ELECTRONIC INTIFADA
http://electronicIntifada.net
_______________________________
__
EI’s ongoing coverage of the Gaza siege: http://electronicintifada.net/bytopic/685.shtml
——————————————————– Read the rest of this entry »
Permalink
Posted in you've got mail at 3:03 pm by nemo
by John Michael Greer
The Archdruid Report (February 21 2008)
Druid perspectives on nature, culture, and the future of industrial society
The Druid order I head hosts an email list for its members and friends,
and the conversations there cover a dizzying range of topics. Some
months ago, as I recall, composting became the subject du jour. In the
course of the discussion, one listmember reminisced about the day she
decided to marry the man who is now her husband. It was Valentine’s day,
romantically enough, and he arrived with a very special gift: a new
compost bin. Anyone might have brought flowers or chocolates, she
explained, but the fact that he realized how much a compost bin would
mean to her defined him, in her eyes, as Mr Right.
Read the rest of this entry »
Permalink
02.28.08
Posted in Evolution at 8:01 pm by nemo
The battle of the Darwin paradigm has gone on so long, it seems frozen in time, and with little result for critics, but this fact is in itself a grave danger for science. Because the end must come sometime. In fact, the opposition has gone on equally long, and simply waits for what will be the crash of science itself. Defeating the critics is a disaster. The idiots take control.
Check out Science Blogs: PH/D’s who haven’t a clue.
Best to do something about it!
This situation is morbid, because when the end comes, people will ask how it was possible that so many experts couldn’t deal with the issues, were frozen.
Are you a Darwinist? The burden is on YOU to figure why Darwinism is false. Apply a dialectical method, the same as the debate method, but one in which you take both sides of the argument. Let us grant the fact of evolution. We are talking about the theories of natural selection.
We can deal out design arguments. They are as problematical as the Darwinian.
We are not talking about a substitute. Merely withdrawing a claim to the explanation of evolution.
Are you a Darwinist? The burden is on YOU to figure why Darwinism is false.
Open a file: the problems with Darwinian theory. The conclusive issues that make non-religious critics with no agenda to promote religion certain the theory can’t work.
Permalink
Posted in Evolution at 7:53 pm by nemo
On This Day In History
150 years ago Alfred Russel Wallace sent a letter to Charles Darwin, describing natural selection.
This notorious episode is the permanent blight on the integrity of biological Darwinism, and shows how the whole game is a Big Cheat.
There have been many posts here on this.
If Wallace had prevailed
Wallace
Permalink
Posted in Evolution at 7:39 pm by nemo
How a ‘just so’ story turns into just ’so?’– HIV and the failures of Intelligent Design
By SA Smith
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/just-so-story.cfm
Abigail Smith, the graduate student conducting research with HIV viruses who recently forced Michael Behe to grudgingly admit error in his book “Edge of Evolution” (to our knowledge it was the first ever occurrence of a leading advocate of intelligent design admitting an error) tells in this post the exciting story of a new development in virusology. This is a vivid example of the fertility of the genuine science being so much in contrast with the abject futility of intelligent design “theory.” It also is another devastating hit upon Behe’s erroneous position as evinced in his latest book so highly praised by the Discovery Institute’s pseudo-scientists.
published: Feb 27, 2008
Permalink
Posted in Evolution at 4:48 pm by nemo
comment from author of “Save Our Selves from Science Gone Wrong”, at self-evolved.com
Shaun Johnston said,
February 28, 2008 at 11:05 am · Edit
If Miller’s take on evolution becomes adopted, then what is one say about science’s previous refusal to admit there’s design in nature? “It’s because we’ve changed what “design” means”? “We were mistaken about there being no design”?
The timing is perfect. “Expelled…” looms, and science backpedals. “Ok, we’ll agree there’s design, now it’s OK to say so. See, we’re not suppressing anything”
Read the rest of this entry »
Permalink
« Previous entries