04.02.08
Detecting directionality
In my last posting, we saw that Kevin Zeigler placed great emphasis and significance on the fact that science has not discovered objective evidence for teleology in evolution. But as I noted, does this tell us more about evolution or more about the human construct we call science? Zeigler told us there was indeed a purpose behind his essay, but could science ever discover it?
The reason noone can find evidence for teleology in evolution lies in the agendas of those who don’t know what ‘teleology’ means.
A close look at the eonic effect show how the question (taken as ‘directionality’) is easily observable, but the results won’t satisfy either Darwinian or religious propaganda.
Stephen P. Smith said,
April 2, 2008 at 5:49 pm
The said “agendas” are themselves beholden to teleology: either as the affirmation the ontic drive; or as the destruction of the foolish directionality that is opposed to the ontic drive.