History, Evolution, and The Darwin Debate

Darwiniana header image 2

Anti-empire report

May 31st, 2008 · No Comments

Read this or George W Bush will be president the rest of your life
by William Blum
www.killinghope.org (May 01 2008)

Since I gave up hope, I feel better.

“More than any time in history, mankind now faces a crossroads. One path
leads to despair and utter hopelessness, the other to total extinction.
Let us pray that we have the wisdom to choose correctly.” –Woody Allen

Food riots, in dozens of countries, in the 21st century. Is this what we
envisioned during the post-World War Two, moon-landing 20th century as
humankind’s glorious future? It’s not the end of the world, but you can
almost see it from here.

American writer Henry Miller (1891-1980) once asserted that the role of
the artist was to “inoculate the world with disillusionment”. So just in
case you – for whatever weird reason – cling to the belief/hope that the
United States can be a positive force in ending or slowing down the new
jump in world hunger, here are some disillusioning facts of life.

On December 14 1981 a resolution was proposed in the United Nations
General Assembly which declared that “education, work, health care,
proper nourishment, national development are human rights”. Notice the
“proper nourishment”. The resolution was approved by a vote of 135-1.
The United States cast the only “No” vote.

A year later, December 18 1982, an identical resolution was proposed in
the General Assembly. It was approved by a vote of 131-1. The United
States cast the only “No” vote.

The following year, December 16 1983, the resolution was again put
forth, a common practice at the United Nations. This time it was
approved by a vote of 132-1. There’s no need to tell you who cast the
sole “No” vote.

These votes took place under the Reagan administration.

Under the Clinton administration, in 1996, a United Nations-sponsored
World Food Summit affirmed the “right of everyone to have access to safe
and nutritious food”. The United States took issue with this, insisting
that it does not recognize a “right to food”. Washington instead
championed free trade as the key to ending the poverty at the root of
hunger, and expressed fears that recognition of a “right to food” could
lead to lawsuits from poor nations seeking aid and special trade

The situation of course did not improve under the administration of
George W Bush. In 2002, in Rome, world leaders at another UN-sponsored
World Food Summit again approved a declaration that everyone had the
right to “safe and nutritious food”. The United States continued to
oppose the clause, again fearing it would leave them open to future
legal claims by famine-stricken countries. {2}

Along with petitioning American leaders to become decent human beings we
should be trying to revive the population control movement. Birth rates
must be radically curbed. All else being equal, a markedly reduced
population count would have a markedly beneficial effect upon global
warming and food and water availability (not to mention finding a
parking spot and lots of other advantages). People, after all, are not
eating more. There are simply more, too many people. Some favor limiting
families to two children. Others argue in favor of one child per family.
Still others, who spend a major part of each day digesting the awful
news of the world, are calling for a limit of zero. (The Chinese
government recently announced that the country would have about 400
million more people if it wasn’t for its limit of one or two children
per couple. {3} )

And as long as we’re fighting for hopeless causes, let’s throw in the
demand that corporations involved in driving the cost of oil through the
roof – and dragging food costs with it – must either immediately exhibit
a conspicuous social conscience or risk being nationalized, their
executives taken away in orange jumpsuits, handcuffs, and leg shackles.
The same for other corporations and politicians involved in championing
the replacement of food crops with biofuel crops or exploiting any of
the other steps along the food-chain system which puts bloated income
ahead of putting food in people’s mouths. We’re not speaking here of
weather phenomena beyond the control of man, we’re speaking of men
making decisions, based not on people’s needs but on pseudo-scientific,
amoral mechanisms like supply and demand, commodity exchanges, grain
futures, selling short, selling long, and other forms of speculation,
all fed and multiplied by the proverbial herd mentality – a system
governed by only two things: fear and greed; not a rational way to feed
a world of human beings.

The Wall Street Journal reports that grain-processing giant
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company said its quarterly profits “jumped 42%,
including a sevenfold increase in net income in its unit that stores,
transports and trades grains such as wheat, corn and soybeans … Some
observers think financial speculation has helped push up prices as
wealthy investors in the past year have flooded the agriculture
commodity markets in search of better returns”. {4} At the same time,
the French Agriculture Minister warned European Union officials against
“too much trust in the free market. We must not leave the vital issue of
feeding people to the mercy of market laws and international
speculation.” {5}

It should be noted that the price of gasoline in the United States
increases on a regular basis, but there’s no shortage of supply. There
are no lines of cars waiting at gas stations. And demand has been
falling as financially-strapped drivers cut back on car use.

Intelligence agents without borders

When Andreas Papandreou assumed his ministerial duties in 1964 in the
Greek government led by his father George Papandreou, he was shocked to
discover an intelligence service out of control, a shadow government
with powers beyond the authority of the nation’s nominal leaders, a
service more loyal to the CIA than to the Papandreou government. This
was a fact of life for many countries in the world during the Cold War,
when the CIA could dazzle a foreign secret service with devices of
technical wizardry, classes in spycraft, vital intelligence, unlimited
money, and American mystique and propaganda. Many of the world’s
intelligence agencies have long provided the CIA with information about
their own government and citizens. The nature of much of this
information has been such that if a private citizen were to pass it to a
foreign power he could be charged with treason. {6}

Leftist Ecuadorian president Rafael Correa declared in April that
Ecuador’s intelligence systems were “totally infiltrated and subjugated
to the CIA”, and accused senior Ecuadoran military officials of sharing
intelligence with Colombia, the Bush administration’s top (if not only)
ally in Latin America. The previous month missiles had been fired into a
camp of the Colombian FARC rebels situated in Ecuador near the Colombian
border, killing about 25. One of those killed was Franklin Aisalla, an
Ecuadorean operative for the group. It turned out that Ecuadorean
intelligence officials had been tracking Aisalla, a fact that was not
shared with the president, but apparently with Colombian forces and
their American military advisers. “I, the president of the republic,
found out about these operations by reading the newspaper”, a visibly
indignant Correa said. “This is not something we can tolerate”. He added
that he planned to restructure the intelligence agencies so he would
have greater direct control over them. {7}

The FARC (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) is routinely referred
to in the world media as “Marxist”, but that designation has not been
appropriate for many years. The FARC has long been basically a criminal
organization – kidnapings for ransom, kidnapings for no apparent reason,
selling protection services to businesses, trafficking in drugs,
fighting the Colombian Army to be free to continue their criminal ways
or to revenge their comrades’ deaths. But Washington, proceeding from
its declared ideology of “If you ain’t with us, you’re against us; in
fact, if you ain’t with us you’re a terrorist”, has designated FARC as a
terrorist group. Every stated definition of “terrorist”, from the FBI to
the United Nations to the US criminal code makes it plain that terrorism
is essentially a political act. This should, logically, exclude FARC
from that category but, in actuality, has no effect on Washington’s
thinking. And now the Bush administration is threatening to add
Venezuela to its list of “nations that support terrorism”, following a
claim by Colombia that it had captured a computer belonging to FARC
after the attack on the group’s campsite in Ecuador. A file allegedly
found on the alleged computer, we are told, suggests that the Venezuelan
government had channeled $300 million to FARC, and that FARC had
appeared interested in acquiring 110 pounds of uranium. {8} What next?
Chavez had met with Osama bin Laden at the campsite?

Amongst the FARC members killed in the Colombian attack on Ecuador were
several involved in negotiations to free Ingrid Betancourt, a former
Colombian presidential candidate who also holds French citizenship and
is gravely ill. The French government and Venezuelan president Hugo
Chavez have been very active in trying to win Betancourt’s freedom.
Individuals collaborating with Chavez have twice this year escorted a
total of six hostages freed by the FARC into freedom, including four
former Colombian legislators. The prestige thus acquired by Chavez has
of course not made Washington ideologues happy. If Chavez should have a
role in the freeing of Betancourt – the FARC’s most prominent prisoner –
his prestige would jump yet higher. The raid on the FARC camp has put an
end to the Betancourt negotiations, at least for the near future.

The raid bore the fingerprints of the US military/CIA – a Predator drone
aircraft dropped “smart bombs” after pinpointing the spot by monitoring
a satellite phone call between a FARC leader and Chavez. A Colombian
Defense Ministry official admitted that the United States had provided
his government with intelligence used in the attack, but denied that
Washington had provided the weapons. {9} The New York Times observed
that “The predawn operation bears remarkable similarities to one carried
out in late January by the United States in Pakistan”. {10}

So what do we have here? Washington has removed a couple of dozen
terrorists (or “terrorists”) from the ranks of the living without any
kind of judicial process. Ingrid Betancourt continues her imprisonment,
now in its sixth year, but another of Hugo Chavez’s evil-commie plans
has been thwarted. And the CIA – as with its torture renditions – has
once again demonstrated its awesome power: anyone, anywhere, anytime,
anything, all laws domestic and international be damned, no lie too big.

“After such knowledge, what forgiveness?” –T S Eliot

Barack Obama’s pastor, Jeremiah Wright, held a press conference at the
National Press Club in Washington on April 28, during which he was asked
about his earlier statement that the US government had invented the HIV
virus, which causes AIDS, “as a means of genocide against people of color”.

Wright did not offer any kind of evidence to support his claim. Even
more important, the claim makes little sense. Why would the US
government want to wipe out people of color? Undoubtedly, many
government officials, past and present, have been racists, but the
capitalist system at home and its imperialist brother abroad have no
overarching ideological or realpolitik need for such a genocide. During
the seven decades of the Cold War, the American power elite was much
more interested in a genocide of “communists”, of whatever color,
wherever they might be found. Many weapons which might further this
purpose were researched, including, apparently, an HIV-like virus.
Consider this: On June 09 1969, Dr Donald M MacArthur, Deputy Director,
Research and Engineering, Department of Defense, testified before Congress:

Within the next five to ten, it would probably be possible to make a new
infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects
from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is
that it might be refractory [resistant] to the immunological and
therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative
freedom from infectious disease. {11}

Whether the United States actually developed such a microorganism and
what it did with it has not been reported. AIDS was first identified by
the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 1981. It’s
certainly possible that the disease arose as a result of Defense
Department experiments, and then spread as an unintended consequence.

If you think that our leaders, as wicked as they are, would not stoop to
any kind of biological or chemical warfare against people, consider that
in 1984 an anti-Castro Cuban exile, on trial in a New York court,
testified that in the latter part of 1980 a ship traveled from Florida
to Cuba with “a mission to carry some germs to introduce them in Cuba to
be used against the Soviets and against the Cuban economy, to begin what
was called chemical war, which later on produced results that were not
what we had expected, because we thought that it was going to be used
against the Soviet forces, and it was used against our own people, and
with that we did not agree”. {12}

It’s not clear from the testimony whether the Cuban man thought that the
germs would somehow be able to confine their actions to only Russians.
This was but one of many instances where the CIA or Defense Department
used biological or chemical weapons against Cuba and other countries,
including in the United States against Americans, at times with fatal
consequences. {13}

Breaking the media barrier

“You take that framework of people feeling locked out, shut out,
marginalized, disrespected, and you go from Iraq to Palestine to Israel,
from Enron to Wall Street, from Katrina to the bungling of the Bush
administration, to the complicity of the Democrats in not stopping him
on the war, stopping him on the tax cuts … If the Democrats can’t
landslide the Republicans this year, they ought to just wrap up, close
down, emerge in a different form. You think the American people are
going to vote for a pro-war John McCain who almost gives an indication
he’s the candidate of perpetual war, perpetual intervention overseas?”

Thus spaketh Ralph Nader as he announced his presidential candidacy to a
national audience on NBC’s Meet the Press in February. The next day his
words appeared in the Washington Post, Kansas City Star, Associated
Press, Fort Worth Star-Telegram, International Herald Tribune, and
numerous other publications, news agencies, and websites around the
world. And other parts of his interview were also repeated, like this in
the Washington Post: “Let’s get over it and try to have a diverse,
multiple-choice, multiple-party democracy, the way they have in Western
Europe and Canada”.

This is why Ralph Nader runs for office. To get our views a hearing in
the mainstream media (which we often, justifiably, look down upon but
are forced to make use of), and offer Americans an alternative to the
tweedledumb and tweedledumber political parties and their cookie-cutter
candidates with their “status quo long live the empire” souls. Is
Nader’s campaign not eminently worthwhile? But as always, he faces
formidable obstacles, amongst which is what H L Mencken once observed:
“The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the most
daring liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to
tell them the truth”.

Here are a couple of campaigns to contribute time and money to:

Ralph Nader – http://www.votenader.org/

Cindy Sheehan, running for Congress in San Francisco against Nancy
“Impeachment is off the table” Pelosi – http://www.cindyforcongress.org/

“Building a new world” conference

May 22-25, Radford University, Radford, Virginia, five-hour drive from
Washington, DC. Cindy Sheehan, Kathy Kelly, Michael Parenti, David
Swanson, Gareth Porter, William Blum, Medea Benjamin, Gary Corseri, Mike
Whitney, Kevin Zeese, Robert Jensen, and others. Room and board
available at reasonable rates. Full details at:


{1} Washington Post, November 18 1996

{2} Reuters news agency, June 10 2002

{3} Washington Post, March 03 2008

{4} “Grain Companies’ Profits Soar As Global Food Crisis Mounts”, Wall
Street Journal, April 30 2008, page 1

{5} Washington Post, April 27 2008, page 13

{6} William Blum, Killing Hope (1995), pages 217-8

{7} New York Times, April 21 2008

{8} New York Times, March 04 2008

{9} Agence France Presse, March 24 2008

{10} New York Times, April 21 2008

{11} Hearings before the House Subcommittee of the Committee on
Appropriations, “Department of Defense Appropriations for 1970”

{12} Testimony of Eduardo Victor Arocena Perez, on trial in Federal
District Court for the Southern District of New York, transcript of
September 10 1984, pages 2187-89.

{13} William Blum, Rogue State (2002), chapters 14 and 15

William Blum is the author of:-

Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions Since World War Two
(Common Courage Press, 1995)

Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower (Zed Books, 2002)

West-Bloc Dissident: A Cold War Memoir (Soft Skull Press, 2002)

Freeing the World to Death: Essays on the American Empire (Common
Courage Press, 2004)

Portions of the books can be read, and copies purchased, at
http://www.killinghope.org and previous Anti-Empire Reports can be read
at this website.

To add yourself to this mailing list simply send an email to
bblum6@aol.com with “add” in the subject line. I’d like your name and
city in the message, but that’s optional. I ask for your city only in
case I’ll be speaking in your area.

Or put “remove” in the subject line to do the opposite.

Any part of this report may be disseminated without permission. I’d
appreciate it if the website were mentioned.


Tags: you've got mail

0 responses so far ↓

  • There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.

Leave a Comment