11.20.08
Non-random evolution in world history
There is something ridiculous about the current Darwin debate: it is owned and operated by two errors, with no third way allowed to reach the public. Can propagandists do science? I fear not.
In a way this situation arises for good Kantian reasons: it is about an unobserved totality (deep time), and the result is metaphysics.
It is hard to face the reality that we can’t close the case on evolution, as yet, or, perhaps, ever.
Or that world history is the evolutionary dataset of last resort. And the study of history shows us ironically what we are missing with Darwinism. The clear and unmistakable evidence of non-random patterning in world history is a reality that Darwinists refuse to face, because it shows something that is not supposed to exist, but does.
From World History And The Eonic Effect
It is world history itself that shows us the clue to evolution. Darwinists, by distracting attention to times unseen, have confused us completely. We are ready to examine the phenomenon of the eonic effect, the evidence of a non-random pattern in world history. And this will uncover evolution behind history, the real meaning of evolution as a macro process, in an extended sense that is more than genetic. The one thing Darwinists don’t want to find is such a non-random pattern, anywhere. The data for seeing such a pattern has reached critical mass only in our own times, and can be highlighted by simple inspection using careful periodization. The conclusion is inescapable: this structure demonstrates the existence of an evolutionary driver operating where least expected.
Darwinists claim that evolution is random, and that this applies to history also. Has anyone bothered to check the data? Against this, we discover, since the invention of writing, a rich patterning, a definite derandomized structure. So Darwinized thinking is wrong about history. That’s that. The eonic effect is a warning that the whole project of selectionist theory fails with history.