http://darwiniana.com/2008/11/28/more-on-revinventing-the-sacred/ History, Evolution, and the Darwin Debate Tue, 22 May 2012 18:00:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://darwiniana.com/2008/11/28/more-on-revinventing-the-sacred/comment-page-1/#comment-222491 nemo Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:28:29 +0000 http://darwiniana.com/?p=15803#comment-222491 I have been too easy on Kauffman, as per your own criticisms, but it seems to me that we have to somehow deal with one of the original proponents of self-organization, e.g. as in At Home In The Universe, which essentially exposed the flaw in Darwin's theory (no matter that Hume also used the term 'self-organization' to describe evolution long ago). I have been too easy on Kauffman, as per your own criticisms, but it seems to me that we have to somehow deal with one of the original proponents of self-organization, e.g. as in At Home In The Universe, which essentially exposed the flaw in Darwin’s theory (no matter that Hume also used the term ‘self-organization’ to describe evolution long ago).

]]> http://darwiniana.com/2008/11/28/more-on-revinventing-the-sacred/comment-page-1/#comment-222423 James Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:03:53 +0000 http://darwiniana.com/?p=15803#comment-222423 I haven't read Bennett, but from what I gather the main value of his work is that it gives a sense of what a psychology of the future (i.e. beyond reductionist and spiritual fallacies) might look like even if one can't take the specifics of his work seriously. Would you say that Bennett is out of Wilber's league? Maybe this is like asking someone to compare the skills of two garbagemen. I haven’t read Bennett, but from what I gather the main value of his work is that it gives a sense of what a psychology of the future (i.e. beyond reductionist and spiritual fallacies) might look like even if one can’t take the specifics of his work seriously. Would you say that Bennett is out of Wilber’s league? Maybe this is like asking someone to compare the skills of two garbagemen.

]]>