<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reinventing The Sacred</title>
	<atom:link href="http://darwiniana.com/2009/02/18/reinventing-the-sacred/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/02/18/reinventing-the-sacred/</link>
	<description>History, Evolution, and the Darwin Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:43:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/02/18/reinventing-the-sacred/comment-page-1/#comment-331683</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=19935#comment-331683</guid>
		<description>However, I do agree that Kauffman is ultimately too incompetent to accomplish anything in this area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However, I do agree that Kauffman is ultimately too incompetent to accomplish anything in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/02/18/reinventing-the-sacred/comment-page-1/#comment-331682</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=19935#comment-331682</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, but my intention wasn&#039;t to champion the specific content of any form of &quot;God&quot; discourse since my comment includes people who don&#039;t share the same views (Plotinus, for instance, wasn&#039;t a pantheist).  The basic issue is whether we can redefine the issues as we see in Spinoza, Kant, Hegel, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, but my intention wasn&#8217;t to champion the specific content of any form of &#8220;God&#8221; discourse since my comment includes people who don&#8217;t share the same views (Plotinus, for instance, wasn&#8217;t a pantheist).  The basic issue is whether we can redefine the issues as we see in Spinoza, Kant, Hegel, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

