<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Darwin shouldn&#8217;t be in schools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://darwiniana.com/2009/02/25/why-darwin-shouldnt-be-in-schools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/02/25/why-darwin-shouldnt-be-in-schools/</link>
	<description>History, Evolution, and the Darwin Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:43:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen P. Smith</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/02/25/why-darwin-shouldnt-be-in-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-331808</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen P. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=20244#comment-331808</guid>
		<description>One could argue that Wallace&#039;s passivity was a result of the apparent limits of natural selection that Darwin was clueless about. The theory goes to Wallace because Wallace understood these limits better, and hence had a better account of evolution. Darwin never stole Wallace&#039;s theory, because Darwin got the theory wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One could argue that Wallace&#8217;s passivity was a result of the apparent limits of natural selection that Darwin was clueless about. The theory goes to Wallace because Wallace understood these limits better, and hence had a better account of evolution. Darwin never stole Wallace&#8217;s theory, because Darwin got the theory wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

