<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The strangeness of Tibetan Buddhism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://darwiniana.com/2009/03/29/the-strangeness-of-tibetan-buddhism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/03/29/the-strangeness-of-tibetan-buddhism/</link>
	<description>History, Evolution, and the Darwin Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:43:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemo</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/03/29/the-strangeness-of-tibetan-buddhism/comment-page-1/#comment-332571</link>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=22057#comment-332571</guid>
		<description>It is strange, but Kant was a funny kind of &#039;atheist&#039; who concealed himself behind the recreation of a kind of theism, or Spinozism in his ethical system, the divine as the spirit of ethics, or something...
This is too much for most secularists. 
It is a pity that for this reason so many secularists and/or atheists miss the chance to learn from kant&#039;s critical system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is strange, but Kant was a funny kind of &#8216;atheist&#8217; who concealed himself behind the recreation of a kind of theism, or Spinozism in his ethical system, the divine as the spirit of ethics, or something&#8230;<br />
This is too much for most secularists.<br />
It is a pity that for this reason so many secularists and/or atheists miss the chance to learn from kant&#8217;s critical system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/03/29/the-strangeness-of-tibetan-buddhism/comment-page-1/#comment-332565</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=22057#comment-332565</guid>
		<description>Actually, the issue is even more terrifying.  Skinner&#039;s comments indicate that even Kant would be considered taboo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the issue is even more terrifying.  Skinner&#8217;s comments indicate that even Kant would be considered taboo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

