Comments on: QM and Kant http://darwiniana.com/2009/05/09/qm-and-kant-2/ History, Evolution, and the Darwin Debate Thu, 24 May 2012 17:45:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Quantum mechanics, Kant | Kant’s Challenge http://darwiniana.com/2009/05/09/qm-and-kant-2/comment-page-1/#comment-336528 Quantum mechanics, Kant | Kant’s Challenge Sat, 09 May 2009 21:03:44 +0000 http://darwiniana.com/?p=24508#comment-336528 [...] QM and Kant [...] [...] QM and Kant [...]

]]> By: Darwiniana » QM and noumenal/phenomenal? http://darwiniana.com/2009/05/09/qm-and-kant-2/comment-page-1/#comment-336526 Darwiniana » QM and noumenal/phenomenal? Sat, 09 May 2009 20:59:30 +0000 http://darwiniana.com/?p=24508#comment-336526 [...] Comment on Kant and QM James said, May 9, 2009 at 3:36 pm · “Some philosophers see quantum phenomena as a sign of far greater unknown forces at work and it bolsters their view that a spiritual dimension exists.” [...] [...] Comment on Kant and QM James said, May 9, 2009 at 3:36 pm · “Some philosophers see quantum phenomena as a sign of far greater unknown forces at work and it bolsters their view that a spiritual dimension exists.” [...]

]]> By: James http://darwiniana.com/2009/05/09/qm-and-kant-2/comment-page-1/#comment-336523 James Sat, 09 May 2009 20:36:48 +0000 http://darwiniana.com/?p=24508#comment-336523 "Some philosophers see quantum phenomena as a sign of far greater unknown forces at work and it bolsters their view that a spiritual dimension exists." How the f*ck does quantum nonlocality prove that a "spiritual" dimension exists? I don't really understand why everybody says that QT is so counterintuitive. All it tells me is that our simplistic Newtonian views of "differentiation" are rather naive. “Some philosophers see quantum phenomena as a sign of far greater unknown forces at work and it bolsters their view that a spiritual dimension exists.”

How the f*ck does quantum nonlocality prove that a “spiritual” dimension exists? I don’t really understand why everybody says that QT is so counterintuitive. All it tells me is that our simplistic Newtonian views of “differentiation” are rather naive.

]]>