<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Religion within the limits of reason</title>
	<atom:link href="http://darwiniana.com/2009/05/25/religion-within-the-limits-of-reason-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/05/25/religion-within-the-limits-of-reason-2/</link>
	<description>History, Evolution, and the Darwin Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:56:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/05/25/religion-within-the-limits-of-reason-2/comment-page-1/#comment-336692</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 19:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=25525#comment-336692</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the goal of either side is to support human autonomy (despite the animosity that these two sides have for one another, they really represent two sides of a single coin).  One side wants us to believe that we are mechanistic robots and the other side wants us to believe that morality is only possible with the belief in some divine law giver.  Either way, their prescriptions for action represent the antithesis of human autonomy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the goal of either side is to support human autonomy (despite the animosity that these two sides have for one another, they really represent two sides of a single coin).  One side wants us to believe that we are mechanistic robots and the other side wants us to believe that morality is only possible with the belief in some divine law giver.  Either way, their prescriptions for action represent the antithesis of human autonomy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debates over secularism &#124; Kant&#8217;s Challenge</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/05/25/religion-within-the-limits-of-reason-2/comment-page-1/#comment-336690</link>
		<dc:creator>Debates over secularism &#124; Kant&#8217;s Challenge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 18:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=25525#comment-336690</guid>
		<description>[...] Religion within the limits of reason [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Religion within the limits of reason [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

