07.10.09
The eonic model vs Darwinian oversimplifications
James said,
July 10, 2009 at 10:28 am ·
Thanks for clearing it up. I think the main problem with the book is that it throws too many new ideas at you at once…the result, sensory overload.
Thanks, that is at least some feedback, but at this point I am going into a fourth edition blind: I have to guess how peoplel are reacting to the material.
The web statistics are excellent, tho: over a quarter million page views.
But people tend to freeze, the addiction to Darwin’s error confronting the real complexity of evolution induces a sense of shock.
Time, however, to simplify and get a general publisher.
The material may be hard, but it is the absolute minimum complexity needed to even refer to a theory of evolution. And it hides some very elegant and eerie.
It leaves all other treatments of human evolution in the dust.
The Darwinian scenario of natural selection is so pathetically oversimplified and dumbed down as to be beyond belief. And these are the people getting the rubric scientist!
Anyway, the eonic model points to something real and mysterious. I can only hope that some can get past the one-line natural selection (explains everything!) to do the work required to understand it. It is not as hard, after all, as a course in calculus. So what’s the problem?