<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kant, ethics, and &#8216;common ordinary morality&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://darwiniana.com/2009/07/16/28480/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/07/16/28480/</link>
	<description>History, Evolution, and the Darwin Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:23:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darwiniana &#187; The eonic effect and the emergence of values in history/evolution</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/07/16/28480/comment-page-1/#comment-337416</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwiniana &#187; The eonic effect and the emergence of values in history/evolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=28480#comment-337416</guid>
		<description>[...] Comment on Kant, ethics, and ‘common ordinary morality’ James said, July 16, 2009 at 2:39 pm · “These proponents of religious morality are overconfidernt of their position.” An odd position given the fact that contemporary Christians themselves don’t take the Bible seriously as a source for morality. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comment on Kant, ethics, and ‘common ordinary morality’ James said, July 16, 2009 at 2:39 pm · “These proponents of religious morality are overconfidernt of their position.” An odd position given the fact that contemporary Christians themselves don’t take the Bible seriously as a source for morality. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/07/16/28480/comment-page-1/#comment-337415</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=28480#comment-337415</guid>
		<description>&quot;These proponents of religious morality are overconfidernt of their position.&quot;

An odd position given the fact that contemporary Christians themselves don&#039;t take the Bible seriously as a source for morality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;These proponents of religious morality are overconfidernt of their position.&#8221;</p>
<p>An odd position given the fact that contemporary Christians themselves don&#8217;t take the Bible seriously as a source for morality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kant, ethics, and ‘common ordinary morality’ &#124; Kant&#8217;s Challenge</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/07/16/28480/comment-page-1/#comment-337414</link>
		<dc:creator>Kant, ethics, and ‘common ordinary morality’ &#124; Kant&#8217;s Challenge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=28480#comment-337414</guid>
		<description>[...] from Darwiniana [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from Darwiniana [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

