07.25.09
Kant, biology, teleology, and the teleomechanists
Comment on review of Meyer’s book
James said,
July 25, 2009 at 4:17 pm ยท
I found one of your old posts on this topic at the Kant list:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kant/message/936
The links at this essay are no longer valid, refer to history-and-evolution.con for the material on Kant update to third edition.
It is disappointing that Kantians have not proven insightful into Kant’s real vies, and tend to be silent on the fact that Kant would never have been a Darwinist. One of the great resources for postdarwinism is thus blocked.
What a disgrace. And these academics condescend on outsiders.
Universal boobhood of the Darwin paradigm.