08.31.09
Separating Darwin critique from the climate debate
Are climate change deniers like creationists?
Whatever the answer to the question, the fact remains that critiquing Darwinism is a legitimate and necessary scientific activity attempting to expose the pseudo-science of Darwinism. This has nothing to do with conservative/creationist initiatives, e.g. climate change denial.
Looks like it’s time to bring back Clarence Darrow and William Jennings Bryan: The US Chamber of Commerce wants to subject the science of climate change to a “Scopes monkey trial.”
The Los Angeles Times reported Tuesday that the world’s largest business lobby is pushing the Environmental Protection Agency to hold a public hearing to defend its endangerment finding, which determined that greenhouse gases are pollutants that pose a threat to public health and welfare and can therefore be regulated by the EPA under the Clean Air Act.