<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Essentialism and the self</title>
	<atom:link href="http://darwiniana.com/2009/09/20/essentialism-in-the-self/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/09/20/essentialism-in-the-self/</link>
	<description>History, Evolution, and the Darwin Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:29:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemo</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/09/20/essentialism-in-the-self/comment-page-1/#comment-340412</link>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=32873#comment-340412</guid>
		<description>Mr. Arnhardt, you are a qualified philosopher and academic, and should be familiar with the critiques of Kant. 
Your manner of expressing surprise here is a bit strange. 
I think that this issue, as you fear, is subject to seeming contradictions, but so are all other positions. 
Kant&#039;s approach (which never explicitly declares the self beyond space and time!) is perhaps the only one known that can make sense of a confusing set of dillemmas about self, materialism, and supernaturalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Arnhardt, you are a qualified philosopher and academic, and should be familiar with the critiques of Kant.<br />
Your manner of expressing surprise here is a bit strange.<br />
I think that this issue, as you fear, is subject to seeming contradictions, but so are all other positions.<br />
Kant&#8217;s approach (which never explicitly declares the self beyond space and time!) is perhaps the only one known that can make sense of a confusing set of dillemmas about self, materialism, and supernaturalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemo</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/09/20/essentialism-in-the-self/comment-page-1/#comment-340411</link>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=32873#comment-340411</guid>
		<description>To be more accurate, there is a phenomenal and a noumenal aspect of the self. 
My statement is a variant of Kantian thinking: the categories of perception involve those of space and time, which are therefore in part constructions of the mind. Therefore, if that is the case, the &#039;self&#039; ought to be in some fashion, in part, as to its noumenal aspect, over and above space and time. The exact situation is beyond knowledge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be more accurate, there is a phenomenal and a noumenal aspect of the self.<br />
My statement is a variant of Kantian thinking: the categories of perception involve those of space and time, which are therefore in part constructions of the mind. Therefore, if that is the case, the &#8216;self&#8217; ought to be in some fashion, in part, as to its noumenal aspect, over and above space and time. The exact situation is beyond knowledge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

