09.21.09
Case for god? What about a case for a soul, then?
Karen Armstrong Builds A ‘Case for God’
Building a case for god in this culture is not hard, and may sell books, but the real question of religion can’t be settled by scholars like Armstrong, whose debate with Dawkins at WSJ shows her to be Darwinist.
Really?
The case for god is not so important, what about the case for a soul?
Nope that’s not allowed in Darwinians. What is Armstrong’s intent: to just construct a propaganda god for a secular age, more crap for the masses?
It is remarkable how all the positions here fail, and fail the worse at the moment the promoters chicken out, decide not to do it right, and not rock the boat on Darwinism.
I guess Armstrong will have to promote the mythos of soul.