<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schopenhauer, samkhya and design arguments in those who try to avoid them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://darwiniana.com/2009/10/27/schopenhauer-samkhya-and-design-arguments-in-those-who-try-to-avoid-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/10/27/schopenhauer-samkhya-and-design-arguments-in-those-who-try-to-avoid-them/</link>
	<description>History, Evolution, and the Darwin Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:29:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kant, design arguments, natural teleology &#124; Kant&#8217;s Challenge</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2009/10/27/schopenhauer-samkhya-and-design-arguments-in-those-who-try-to-avoid-them/comment-page-1/#comment-341304</link>
		<dc:creator>Kant, design arguments, natural teleology &#124; Kant&#8217;s Challenge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=35049#comment-341304</guid>
		<description>[...] Samkhya and design arugments, and Kant&#8217;s natural teleology [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Samkhya and design arugments, and Kant&#8217;s natural teleology [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

