Comments on: Comment on Armstrong’s Darwinism http://darwiniana.com/2009/11/23/comment-on-armstrongs-darwinism/ History, Evolution, and the Darwin Debate Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:29:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: nemo http://darwiniana.com/2009/11/23/comment-on-armstrongs-darwinism/comment-page-1/#comment-342479 nemo Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:37:22 +0000 http://darwiniana.com/?p=36661#comment-342479 Interesting, I think that is what we are seeing here. Interesting, I think that is what we are seeing here.

]]> By: Todd White http://darwiniana.com/2009/11/23/comment-on-armstrongs-darwinism/comment-page-1/#comment-342474 Todd White Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:18:40 +0000 http://darwiniana.com/?p=36661#comment-342474 In my writings, I usually refer to Karen Armstrong, Robert Wright, Francis Collins, and their ilk as "Kumbaya Guys." The Kumbaya Guys are believers in God who wants to find a “compromise” with atheists by accepting Darwinism without condition – in return for the atheist’s permission that they can believe in a God, as long as such a God is separate from the material world. The “Kumbaya Guys” will sell out any religious principle just so they can find “peace” with those who have no interest in “peace.” They’re the Neville Chamberlains of 21st century religious debate. In my writings, I usually refer to Karen Armstrong, Robert Wright, Francis Collins, and their ilk as “Kumbaya Guys.”

The Kumbaya Guys are believers in God who wants to find a “compromise” with atheists by accepting Darwinism without condition – in return for the atheist’s permission that they can believe in a God, as long as such a God is separate from the material world. The “Kumbaya Guys” will sell out any religious principle just so they can find “peace” with those who have no interest in “peace.” They’re the Neville Chamberlains of 21st century religious debate.

]]>