11.24.09
Darwinism: a bungled theory
Strictly speaking there are no theories of evolution after the fashion of physics. The domain of application for evolutionary theories is highly problematical, and Darwin dummies fall in the trap on the fist step:
John A. Davison said,
November 25, 2009 at 10:16 am
A theory sensu strictu is an hypothesis which has been verified. Darwinism does not even qualify as an hypothesis as it is by its very nature untestable. A “random walk” goes to no certain place. Selection has been tested many times notably with Drosophila melanogaster by Theodosius Dobzhansky who admitted failure but remained a Darwinian nevertheless, one of the most remarkable aspects of the history of the Darwinian myth. Another Darwinian, Julian Huxley, after claiming evolution was finished, also remained a Darwinian to his dying day.
It is hard to believe isn’t it?
I find it most revealing that the Darwinists steadfastly refuse to test selection with the most available material imaginable – Darwin’s finches, still regarded as representing several separate species. The canary is a finch and has been domesticated for centuries. The reason Darwnians refuse to test the Galapagos finches is because they are terrified at what the results might yield. We already know from the work of the Grants that genetically fit “hybrids” occur spontaneously in nature. All real evidence pleads for a single species of Darwin’s finch with many subspecies or mere varieties.
I have reached the conclusion that the only reason Darwinism survives is because its proponents are congenital atheists. There is no longer any question that atheism, like all fanaticism, has a heritable basis. I recommend William Wright’s “Born That Way” for documentation.
I speak as a convinced determinist like Albert Einstein who put it this way -
“Our actions should be based on the ever-present awareness that human beings in their thinking, feeling, and acting ARE NOT FREE but are just as causally bound as the stars in their motion….Then there are the fanatical atheists whose intolerance is the same as that of the religious fanatics, and it springs from the same source… They are creaturs who CAN’T HEAR the music of the spheres.”
(my emphasis in Caps).
Darwinism is a deficiency disease for which no cure is presently available.
Paul Zachary Myers and Richard Dawkins are the last surviving champions of Darwin’s Victorian fantasy and neither has ever contributed a scintilla to the only question which has ever been involved – the MECHANISM of a long ago terminated phylogeny which I believe ended with the production of the contemporary biota never to be replaced. Like all its predecessors it too is probably doomed to extinction and with it the final product of a planned evolution – Homo sapiens.
I hate being right.
“A past evolution is undeniable, a present evolution undemonstrable.”
http://www.jadavison.wordpress.com