11.27.09
Wallace vs Darwin
John A. Davison said,
November 26, 2009 at 4:24 pm ·
Alfred Russel Wallace was ten times the naturalist and scientist as was Darwin. He eventually completely rejected the hypothesis he had shared with Darwin as a young man. Consider the title of his last book -“The World of Life: A Manifestation of of Creative Power, Directive Mind and Ultimate Purpose.” (1911)
His earlier “Man’s Place in the Universe” (1905) demonstrates his command of the science of his day. A pioneer environmentalist, he recognized the dangers of the atmospheric pollution associated with the Industrial Age and correctly identified CO2 (carbonic acid) as the culprit.
“Remember! We claim to be people of high civilization, of advanced science, of geat humanity, of enormous wealth! For very shame do not let us say “We CANNOT arrange matters so that our people may all breathe unpolluted, unpoisoned air.”
page 257 caps in italics in the original.Wallace is vastly underestimated as Darwin is even more vastly overestimated.
John A. Davison said,
November 28, 2009 at 10:55 am
This website, like my own, is avoided by Dawinian zealots and probably for the same reason. They are unable to counter the propositions presented here. Darwinian mystics have traditionally pretended that they never had any critics. That won’t do any longer.
Their silence betrays their desperation which is why Richard Dawkins and Paul Zachary Myers have turned to the only remaining tactic which is to do everything in their power to destroy the only conceiveable alternative to Darwin’s Victorian fantasy – a planned phylogeny. This reality demands one or more creative entities which need not still exist. Atheist Darwinians deny not only a living God, they deny that any God or Gods ever existed, an absurd position by any standard.
I have repeatedly challenged them to a public confrontation on their turf, mine, or anywhere else, all to no avail. They are terrified at the prospect!
“Davison is the Darwinian’s worst nightmare.”
Terry Trainor
“A doctrine which is unable to maintain itself in clear light, but only in the dark, will of necessity lose its effect on mankind with uncalculable harm to human progress.”
Albert Einstein
jadavison.wordpress.com