11.29.09
Kant was/could have been no Darwinist
It is amusing to google on the ‘teleomechanists’, only to find that I am the main commenter on this subject, and the book by Lenoir on this: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=teleomechanists
Kant scholarship is, I fearfully suspect, being devious on this issue for the simple reason that they don’t want to bring the Darwin establishment down on their necks, and thus are deep-sixing the fact that Kant could not have been a Darwinist, and in fact produced what is nearly a critique in advance of Darwin’s idiocy.
We live in a stupid society that has lost the use of Kant, as the endless round of academic bookdealing continues, to no avail.
Kant no Darwinist… | Kant’s Challenge said,
November 30, 2009 at 4:37 pm
[...] Kant no Darwinist… [...]