http://darwiniana.com/2009/12/04/hauser-guilty-of-cowardice/ History, Evolution, and the Darwin Debate Thu, 24 May 2012 17:56:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://darwiniana.com/2009/12/04/hauser-guilty-of-cowardice/comment-page-1/#comment-343028 nemo Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:17:54 +0000 http://darwiniana.com/?p=37309#comment-343028 I think I may have misrepresented his thesis, and was critical because of the probable Darwinism lurking in the background. Hauser's thesis is a very close match (on a superficial level) with Kant's thinking. Despite the problems, it is hard to avoid Kant's suggestion that something he calls 'common ordinary morality' is a part of man's equipment, notwithstanding the apparent exceptions. I think I may have misrepresented his thesis, and was critical because of the probable Darwinism lurking in the background.
Hauser’s thesis is a very close match (on a superficial level) with Kant’s thinking. Despite the problems, it is hard to avoid Kant’s suggestion that something he calls ‘common ordinary morality’ is a part of man’s equipment, notwithstanding the apparent exceptions.

]]> http://darwiniana.com/2009/12/04/hauser-guilty-of-cowardice/comment-page-1/#comment-343000 Todd White Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:16:41 +0000 http://darwiniana.com/?p=37309#comment-343000 Let me get this straight: According to this guy, "all humans" are endowed with a "biological code for living a moral life." Umm, has he ever heard of The Holocaust? Does he even pick up a newspaper? Let me get this straight: According to this guy, “all humans” are endowed with a “biological code for living a moral life.” Umm, has he ever heard of The Holocaust? Does he even pick up a newspaper?

]]>