12.05.09
Rigged system of ID/Darwinism not a real debate
Comment on ID is not science, neither is Darwinism
James said,
December 5, 2009 at 2:59 pm
Both sides have succeeded in terminally confusing the public by claiming that there are only two options. I can’t say that I’ve read one account from either IDers or Darwinists that doesn’t indulge in oversimplifications to support its position. It’s almost better to purge the mainstream debate from your mind. Let’s face it: Dawkins, Behe, Coyne, Meyer, etc. are of Karen Armstrong caliber when it comes to evolutionary theory.
It is sad to watch, because the monopoly of opinion using two opposed viewpoints is especially confusing to the public who think this rigged system is a debate.