Comments on: More on biocentrism and idealism http://darwiniana.com/2009/12/17/more-on-biocentrism-and-idealism/ History, Evolution, and the Darwin Debate Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:29:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Darwiniana » Platonic ‘ideas’ http://darwiniana.com/2009/12/17/more-on-biocentrism-and-idealism/comment-page-1/#comment-356706 Darwiniana » Platonic ‘ideas’ Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:40:17 +0000 http://darwiniana.com/?p=38009#comment-356706 [...] http://darwiniana.com/2009/12/17/more-on-biocentrism-and-idealism/comment-page-1/#comment-356691 [...] [...] http://darwiniana.com/2009/12/17/more-on-biocentrism-and-idealism/comment-page-1/#comment-356691 [...]

]]> By: Dennis Balson http://darwiniana.com/2009/12/17/more-on-biocentrism-and-idealism/comment-page-1/#comment-356691 Dennis Balson Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:59:02 +0000 http://darwiniana.com/?p=38009#comment-356691 If the brain,mind and body are physical I submit that the energy that causes consciousness to come into being is nonphysical, therefore the primary entity within other forms of matter is the same entity that existed since the universe came into being and it is the same entity that caused forms of life to commence and evolve. If the brain,mind and body are physical I submit that the energy that causes consciousness to come into being is nonphysical, therefore the primary entity within other forms of matter is the same entity that existed since the universe came into being and it is the same entity that caused forms of life to commence and evolve.

]]> By: Darwiniana » Comment on biocentrism and idealism http://darwiniana.com/2009/12/17/more-on-biocentrism-and-idealism/comment-page-1/#comment-343333 Darwiniana » Comment on biocentrism and idealism Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:33:49 +0000 http://darwiniana.com/?p=38009#comment-343333 [...] Comment on More on Biocentrism and Idealism From the Quantum Activist http://quantumactivist.com/ mitri said, December 18, 2009 at 1:16 pm · greetings to you thinkers, bravo. as co creator of a recent film about amit goswami and his particular brand of monistic idealism I can assure you that when one uses the word god it is for provocative purposes as well as to refer to a concept that we have no other functional word for. In the case of Amit Goswami and his monistic idealism positing that it is consciousness not matter that is the ground of all being he is making a scientific statement based in both mathematical and lab science. The essential problem of the quantum measurement (i.e. if consciousness is an epiphenomenon of matter but consciousness also collapses the wave into a particle how can consciousness as a brain phenomenon itself a part of matter do this?) this question is profound and in need of resolution. TO posit consciousness as the ground of being and no t matter opens the possibility of solving many of our most tenacious problems in science, the real problem that arrises is the dogmatism from both the materialist science community (including darwinism, that most favored 150 year old child “as if we havn’t learned more since then”) as well as its implied association with the non inquisitive religious dogmatists. Dawkins makes a fool of himself by playing Don Quixote against a straw God that few defend, to take on the questions of the observer consciousness, form and non form are age old questions that the sooner we can answer within science the better all of humanity will be. I am of course biased since I spend several years creating a film on Dr Goswami, but we did so because we felt his message should be added to the mix of scientific scrutiny not to be held high for no reason and not to be discounted by emotionality in the guise of science. I hope we have succeeded. peace. [...] [...] Comment on More on Biocentrism and Idealism From the Quantum Activist http://quantumactivist.com/ mitri said, December 18, 2009 at 1:16 pm · greetings to you thinkers, bravo. as co creator of a recent film about amit goswami and his particular brand of monistic idealism I can assure you that when one uses the word god it is for provocative purposes as well as to refer to a concept that we have no other functional word for. In the case of Amit Goswami and his monistic idealism positing that it is consciousness not matter that is the ground of all being he is making a scientific statement based in both mathematical and lab science. The essential problem of the quantum measurement (i.e. if consciousness is an epiphenomenon of matter but consciousness also collapses the wave into a particle how can consciousness as a brain phenomenon itself a part of matter do this?) this question is profound and in need of resolution. TO posit consciousness as the ground of being and no t matter opens the possibility of solving many of our most tenacious problems in science, the real problem that arrises is the dogmatism from both the materialist science community (including darwinism, that most favored 150 year old child “as if we havn’t learned more since then”) as well as its implied association with the non inquisitive religious dogmatists. Dawkins makes a fool of himself by playing Don Quixote against a straw God that few defend, to take on the questions of the observer consciousness, form and non form are age old questions that the sooner we can answer within science the better all of humanity will be. I am of course biased since I spend several years creating a film on Dr Goswami, but we did so because we felt his message should be added to the mix of scientific scrutiny not to be held high for no reason and not to be discounted by emotionality in the guise of science. I hope we have succeeded. peace. [...]

]]> By: nemo http://darwiniana.com/2009/12/17/more-on-biocentrism-and-idealism/comment-page-1/#comment-343332 nemo Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:29:40 +0000 http://darwiniana.com/?p=38009#comment-343332 Comment upgraded to post Comment upgraded to post

]]> By: mitri http://darwiniana.com/2009/12/17/more-on-biocentrism-and-idealism/comment-page-1/#comment-343330 mitri Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:16:58 +0000 http://darwiniana.com/?p=38009#comment-343330 greetings to you thinkers, bravo. as co creator of a recent film about amit goswami and his particular brand of monistic idealism I can assure you that when one uses the word god it is for provocative purposes as well as to refer to a concept that we have no other functional word for. In the case of Amit Goswami and his monistic idealism positing that it is consciousness not matter that is the ground of all being he is making a scientific statement based in both mathematical and lab science. The essential problem of the quantum measurement (i.e. if consciousness is an epiphenomenon of matter but consciousness also collapses the wave into a particle how can consciousness as a brain phenomenon itself a part of matter do this?) this question is profound and in need of resolution. TO posit consciousness as the ground of being and no t matter opens the possibility of solving many of our most tenacious problems in science, the real problem that arrises is the dogmatism from both the materialist science community (including darwinism, that most favored 150 year old child "as if we havn't learned more since then") as well as its implied association with the non inquisitive religious dogmatists. Dawkins makes a fool of himself by playing Don Quixote against a straw God that few defend, to take on the questions of the observer consciousness, form and non form are age old questions that the sooner we can answer within science the better all of humanity will be. I am of course biased since I spend several years creating a film on Dr Goswami, but we did so because we felt his message should be added to the mix of scientific scrutiny not to be held high for no reason and not to be discounted by emotionality in the guise of science. I hope we have succeeded. peace. greetings to you thinkers, bravo.
as co creator of a recent film about amit goswami and his particular brand of monistic idealism I can assure you that when one uses the word god it is for provocative purposes as well as to refer to a concept that we have no other functional word for. In the case of Amit Goswami and his monistic idealism positing that it is consciousness not matter that is the ground of all being he is making a scientific statement based in both mathematical and lab science. The essential problem of the quantum measurement (i.e. if consciousness is an epiphenomenon of matter but consciousness also collapses the wave into a particle how can consciousness as a brain phenomenon itself a part of matter do this?) this question is profound and in need of resolution. TO posit consciousness as the ground of being and no t matter opens the possibility of solving many of our most tenacious problems in science, the real problem that arrises is the dogmatism from both the materialist science community (including darwinism, that most favored 150 year old child “as if we havn’t learned more since then”) as well as its implied association with the non inquisitive religious dogmatists. Dawkins makes a fool of himself by playing Don Quixote against a straw God that few defend, to take on the questions of the observer consciousness, form and non form are age old questions that the sooner we can answer within science the better all of humanity will be. I am of course biased since I spend several years creating a film on Dr Goswami, but we did so because we felt his message should be added to the mix of scientific scrutiny not to be held high for no reason and not to be discounted by emotionality in the guise of science. I hope we have succeeded.
peace.

]]> By: reece sullivan http://darwiniana.com/2009/12/17/more-on-biocentrism-and-idealism/comment-page-1/#comment-343322 reece sullivan Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:13 +0000 http://darwiniana.com/?p=38009#comment-343322 Thanks, nemo, I'll make a note of the book and check it out. Thanks, nemo,

I’ll make a note of the book and check it out.

]]>