03.12.10
Theories, physics vs evolution
The Oedipus Paradox
We are so conditioned to the triumphs of physics that we assume that a theory of a similar type will work with evolution. But the subjectivity of the proponent of theory enters into the application of theory in this case. It is hard to grasp this point, but if we examine the legacy of Social Darwinism it begins to dawn on us that ‘theories’ are subjective perspectives that collide with the observer’s present. Physics it isn’t.
Dov Henis said,
March 13, 2010 at 2:52 am
Rethink Evoluton
Cosmic Evolution Simplified
On Black Holes, Biosphere(s) And All Mass-Formats
A. A black future
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/feature/id/50326/title/A_black_future
Without destroying the Earth, the Large Hadron Collider might help humans explore the cosmos
B. On The Origin And Nature Of Cosmic Evolution:
It Is Space-Distance, Not Space-Time.
Life’s Is The Ubiquitous Cosmic Evolution Mode.
The mode of a gene’s response to organism-culture’s feedback signal, i.e. “replicate without change” or “replicate with change” in case of proven augmented energy constrainment by the offspring, is the mode of Life’s normal evolution, which is the mode of evolution universally.
Genes’ Expression Modification
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/200/122.page#3649
Again, the scope of of genes lifehood is not just the lifehood of genes.
Genes, and Life in general, are but one of the forms of mass, of constrained energy formats. The lifehood of genes is the foundation of the subject of evolutionary biology, which is a major component of the subject of life, which is a minute component of the subject of evolution of the universe, which is the subject for which humanity seeks a unified field theory.
Since the big-bang resolution of E/m superposition ALL the energy of the universe is destined for the galactic clusters expansion plus laying down of the gravity natrix for the eventual cosmic impansion, and ALL the mass is destined to revert to energy for these ends. The mass-to-energy reversion is resisted by the mass, this resistance being the archtype of selection for survival by all materials, including life. This resistance is due, exciting to us, to the fact that – as we know from everyday experience – formation of mass requires investment of energy, that dissipates when the mass disintegrates. And as we also know from everyday experience all energy forms other than gravity end up eventually as gravity energy. This is expected since ALL the contents of the universe are manifestations of the gravity energy freed at Inflation.
And again, a unified field theory is sought since unlike the evergrowing list of specific science/technology divisions drawn by the “scientists” trade-unions like the AAAS, the universe and Earth evolve as an integrated intertwined interrelated tangled whole and not as a collection of individual divisions.
C. Updated Physical Evolution Definition
1. Three present definitions of physical evolution, at
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/evolution
- a process of change in a certain direction.
- a theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modifications in their successive generations, and also the process described by this theory.
- a process in which the whole universe is a progression of interrelated phenomena.
2. Suggested updated physical evolution definition, of Life’s normal evolution and universal energy-mass evolution.
a theory, and the process described by it, that the whole universe changes in a progression of interrelated phenomena of mass formats attaining temporary augmented energy constraint in their successive generations with energy drained from other mass formats, to temporarily postpone, survive, reverting of their own mass to the cosmic energy fueling the galactic clusters expansion.
D. Black holes of ALL sizes are constrained-energy mass formats. Like biosphere(s) they require energy to survive temporarily, to avoid as long as possible their energy used to fuel the ongoing cosmic expansion. So are ALL mass formats in the universe.
Dov Henis
(Comments From The 22nd Century)
03.2010 Updated Life Manifest
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/54.page#5065
28Dec09 Implications Of E=Total[m(1 + D)]
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/184.page#4587
Darwiniana » Cosmic Evolution Simplified said,
March 13, 2010 at 6:31 pm
[...] Comment on Theories, physics vs evolution Dov Henis said, [...]