<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soul talk and positivistic failure mode</title>
	<atom:link href="http://darwiniana.com/2010/05/08/soul-talk-and-positivistic-failure-mode/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://darwiniana.com/2010/05/08/soul-talk-and-positivistic-failure-mode/</link>
	<description>History, Evolution, and the Darwin Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:29:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemo</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2010/05/08/soul-talk-and-positivistic-failure-mode/comment-page-1/#comment-349609</link>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 18:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=44690#comment-349609</guid>
		<description>Current thought can&#039;t distinguish ideas of soul from the many differentiations that seem to be the reality. Fantasies about the soul are legion. But the &#039;bardo&#039; state depicted in Buddhism suggests that the &#039;psyche&#039; as we know it does not survive death, but that a deeper aspect of the &#039;person&#039; does emerge as the psyche is stripped away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Current thought can&#8217;t distinguish ideas of soul from the many differentiations that seem to be the reality. Fantasies about the soul are legion. But the &#8216;bardo&#8217; state depicted in Buddhism suggests that the &#8216;psyche&#8217; as we know it does not survive death, but that a deeper aspect of the &#8216;person&#8217; does emerge as the psyche is stripped away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemo</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2010/05/08/soul-talk-and-positivistic-failure-mode/comment-page-1/#comment-349608</link>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 18:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=44690#comment-349608</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s true about Schopenhauer, perhaps, but we are not talking, in his terms, of soul at all: but of the noumenal roots of mind that pace the categories of perception projects the space-time matrix (right word, go see the movie, The Matrix).
The term &#039;soul&#039; is played out perhaps, but the basic issue remains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s true about Schopenhauer, perhaps, but we are not talking, in his terms, of soul at all: but of the noumenal roots of mind that pace the categories of perception projects the space-time matrix (right word, go see the movie, The Matrix).<br />
The term &#8216;soul&#8217; is played out perhaps, but the basic issue remains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2010/05/08/soul-talk-and-positivistic-failure-mode/comment-page-1/#comment-349599</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 12:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=44690#comment-349599</guid>
		<description>Soul talk is mostly garbage, and Schopenhauer didn&#039;t look like he believed in soul???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soul talk is mostly garbage, and Schopenhauer didn&#8217;t look like he believed in soul???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

