06.30.10
More on Darwinian refutations
Comment on Refutations (of Darwinism)
Stephen said,
June 29, 2010 at 1:23 pm ·
Summary of my arguments: There is no disinterested science. Self-interested logic has been unable to make a distinction between the precondition of natural selection (which is a presumed randomness and an assumed fitness landscape) and with apparent teleology. The distinction never comes within ontology, and when you look to evidence the situation becomes even more contrived as evolution is found more and more complicated. In other words, this problem never goes way until it is realized that life`s “struggle” for survival is a metaphysical projection that should in fact be pointed at in public schools. Seems like a tight argument to me!