07.31.10
WDGW review
Links to Review of What Darwin Got Wrong
A review at TPM (The Philosopher’s Magazine) is about as reliable as an astrological prediction.
The magazine is the worst kind of academic pseudo-philosophy and is an abject lickspittle to scientism/Darwinism.
I think that the problem with Fodor/PP’s book is that it is too slyly arcane to really bear full conviction.
There is nothing complex about the failure of natural selection: as Fred Hoyle pointed out years ago, the statistics won’t work. Period.
Zendo said,
July 31, 2010 at 4:47 pm
The Fodor book is obscure and incomprehensible, but maybe that disarmed some of its critics