Is there a science of history?
The question that causes reductionist scientism to unravel. Note how scientists avoid the question (except the most naive) and skulk away, licked.
The question reductionists fear
September 5th, 2010 · 8 Comments
Tags: General
8 responses so far ↓
1 Dov Henis // Sep 5, 2010 at 2:26 pm
About The Science Of History: It’s The Science Of Distance From The Big Bang Event. Distance, Not Time.
Natural Selection Derives From Cosmic Expansion
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/user/profile/1655.page
“Evolution is energy temporarily constrained in a mass format to postpone reconversion of the mass to the energy fueling the cosmic expansion”.
Source:
Cosmic Evolution Beyond Darwin And Einstein
Natural Selection Derives From Cosmic Expansion
Two suggested editorial items:
I.
Origin And Nature Of Natural Selection
Update Concepts And Comprehension
Life is another mass format.
All mass formats are subject to natural selection.
Natural selection is delaying conversion of mass to energy fueling cosmic expansion.
Cosmic expansion is reconversion of all mass to energy.
Natural Selection Updated 2010
Beyond Historical Concepts
Natural Selection applies to ALL mass formats. Life is just one of them.
Natural Selection Defined:
Natural selection is E (energy) temporarily constrained in an m (mass) format.
Period.
Natural selection is a ubiquitous property of each and every and all cosmic mass, spin array, formats. Mass strives to increase its constrained energy content in attempt to postpone its conversion to energy and the addition of its constitutional energy to the totality of the cosmic energy that keeps fueling the cosmic expansion that goes on since the big bang.
Dov Henis
(Comments From The 22nd Century)
03.2010 Updated Life Manifest
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/54.page#5065
Cosmic Evolution Simplified
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/240/122.page#4427
Gravity Is The Monotheism Of The Cosmos
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/260/122.page#4887
EOTOE, Embarrassingly obvious TOE, expanding the horizon beyond Darwin And Einstein
http://www.molecularfossils.com/2010/05/formal-test-of-theory-of-universal.html
—————————————-
Origin And Nature Of Natural Selection
Longevity Schmongevity Genes
It’s Not The Procedure, But The Concept That Is Absurd
Longevity Genes Search Reflects Science Decadence
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/320/122.page#6368
A. For most centenarians, longevity is written in the DNA.
A study of people who live past 100 reveals many genetic paths to a long life.
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/60772/title/For_most_centenarians%2C_longevity_is_written_in_the_DNA
B. Longevity, survival, natural selection, evolution
– Merriam-Webster OnLine
Longevity = a : a long duration of individual life b : length of life
– Longevity is about survival, which is about “natural selection”, which is about energy constrainment, which is about life evolution, which is about cosmic evolution. Every mass is destined to become energy to fuel the ongoing cosmic expansion. This is why organisms and black holes etc., eat, digest energy in mass forms, to avoid-postpone conversion to energy. This is evolution, which is natural selection, which is survival, which is longevity.
– All mass formats age. Life is a mass format. Searching for longevity genes is searching for evolution genes…
C. The search for longevity genes is a reflection of the 20th-21st centuries science decadence
Its concepts and terminology reflect the abandonment of basic science for adoption of the pretentious cancerous capitalist 20th-21st century technology culture.
Dov Henis
(Comments From The 22nd Century)
II.
Rethink Astronomy And The Universe
even without Quantum Unique Ergodicity, but with plain commonsense
Galactic clusters formed by dispersion, not by conglomeration. The proof of this is their behaviour, including acceleration, as Newtonian bodies.
These bodies formed at the start of inflation, when all energy was still in mass format, and the inflation was the start of reconversion of cosmic mass into energy. Cosmic expansion acceleration rate differs for each galactic cluster, proceeding according to Newton’s laws, proportional to the various galactic clusters’ masses:
Rethink
– A Basic Physics Tenet
– The Universe In Which We Live
A. Neutrino quick-change artist caught in the act
A transformation from one ‘flavor’ to another confirms the elusive elementary particles have mass and suggests a need for new physics.
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/59825/title/Neutrino_quick-change_artist_caught_in_the_act
B. Adopt
– Each and every particle has mass.
– Dark energy and matter YOK.
– Higgs field/particle YOK.
– Do not be afraid of embarrassingly obvious answers. Adopt space-distance in lieu of space-time.
C. And Rethink The Universe
By the presently available data our universe is a dual-cycle array.
One cycle, the present, started from singularity, with all cosmic energy in mass format, and it has been proceeding to reconvert all the mass resolved at the big bang back to energy, by expanding the cosmos, by accelerating away the galaxy clusters.
The other cycle, the cycle that led to singularity, will re-start when the expanding cosmos consumes most or all mass that fuels the expansion. Gravity will then initiate reconversion of all the energy back to mass, to singularity, again.
Dov Henis
(Comments From The 22nd Century)
Cosmic Evolution Simplified
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/240/122.page#4427
Gravity Is The Monotheism Of The Cosmos
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/260/122.page#4887
EOTOE.Embarrassingly obvious expanding horizons beyond Darwin And Einstein.
http://www.molecularfossils.com/2010/05/formal-test-of-theory-of-universal.html
2 Update Comprehension Of Universe/Life Evolution « dovhenis // Jul 18, 2011 at 9:40 am
[…] http://darwiniana.com/2010/09/05/the-question-reductionists-fear/ […]
3 21st Century Science, Whence And Whither… « dovhenis // Dec 13, 2011 at 11:26 am
[…] http://darwiniana.com/2010/09/05/the-question-reductionists-fear/ […]
4 Hope For 2011 Science? « dovhenis // Dec 17, 2011 at 4:39 am
[…] “Evolution, Natural Selection, Derive From Cosmic Expansion” http://darwiniana.com/2010/09/05/the-question-reductionists-fear/ […]
5 Dov Henis // Jan 31, 2015 at 12:29 am
Again, The Universe-Life whence- whither…the basest science basics
A. Some of my old pre- WP blog posts copied into my this WP universe-life blog:
http://www.lhcportal.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=667
Why Dark Matter And Energy YOK
The LHC Chases Its Tail
Galaxy Clusters Evolved By Dispersion
For What The Stars Twinkle
Higgs Field-Particle YOK
Rethink A Basic Physics Tenet and The Universe
Origin And Nature Of Natural Selection, Update Concepts And Comprehension
B. See also
http://universe-life.com/2013/11/14/subverting-organized-religious-science/
C. Again, The Universe – Life Relationship,
From
http://universe-life.com/2014/07/11/compilation-of-evolutionthe-2013-science-feat-and-humanitys-godscience/
Since the last big-bang all mass formats, including life – which is one of them – undergo the same cyclic mass – energy sequence like the universe itself i.e. conception (singularity)- birth (bang) – evolution (inflation/expansion) – survival ( simultaneous expansion+ re-conception in black holes) – replication (repeat singularity, etc.,)
Dov Henis (comments from 22nd century, one of the many humans with highly exaggerated self-esteem)
http://universe-life.com/
=====
Life Genesis From Aromaticity/H-Bonding
September 30, 2011
Liberate your mind from concepts dictated by religious trade-union AAAS.
(1) Life is just another mass format. (2) Re-comprehend natural selection. (3) Natural selection is ubiquitous, for all mass formats.
Life Evolves by Naturally Selected Organic Matter
EarthLife Genesis From Aromaticity/H-Bonding
http://universe-life.com/2011/09/30/earthlife-genesis-from-aromaticityh-bonding/
September 30, 2011
A.
Purines and pyrimidines are two of the building blocks of nucleic acids. Only two purines and three pyrimidines occur widely in nucleic acids.
B.
Pyrimidine is a heterocyclic aromatic organic compound similar to benzene and pyridine, containing two nitrogen atoms at positions 1 and 3 of the six-member ring.
A purine is a heterocyclic aromatic organic compound, consisting of a pyrimidine ring fused to an imidazole ring. Purines, including substituted purines and their tautomers, are the most widely distributed kind of nitrogen-containing heterocycle in nature.
Aromaticity ( Kekule, Loschmidt, Thiele) is essential for the Krebs Cycle for energy production.
C.
Natural selection is E (energy) temporarily constrained in an m (mass) format.
Natural selection is a universal ubiquitous trait of ALL mass spin formats, inanimate and animate.
Life began/evolved on Earth with the natural selection of inanimate RNA, then of some RNA nucleotides, then arriving at the ultimate mode of natural selection – self replication.
Aromaticity enables good constraining of energy and good propensity to hydrogen bonding. The address of Earth Life Genesis, of phasing from inanimate to animate natural selection, is Aromaticity.Hydrogen Bonding.
Dov Henis (comments from 22nd century)
Earth Life Genesis
http://universe-life.com/2011/09/30/earthlife-genesis-from-aromaticityh-bonding/
Seed Of Human-Chimp Genomes Diversity
http://universe-life.com/2011/07/10/seed-of-human-chimp-genomes-diversity/
Genetics is modifications of genome’s expressions in response to cultural variations, i.e. to behavioral modifications in response to circumstantial variations. DH
6 Dov Henis // Jan 31, 2015 at 12:31 am
On the basest basic research, in plain English+Hebrew, not in academEnglish verbiage:
Compilation of Evolution,THE 2013 science feat, and humanity’s god/science
???????? ??? ????? ?? ??????
?? ???? ????? ????? ????? ??? ??? ????? ??????? ???? ???????, ??? ?”??????”??????? ???, ??? ????? ????? ?????? ?? ????? ???? ???? ????? ??????.
?? ????? ???? (“???????????”) ?????? ??, ??????? ???????, ??????? ??????? ??????? ??????? ?? ??????. ??? ??? ??? ?? ????? ??? ??? ?? ??????.
?? ????? ???? ????? ?????, ???? ???? ????? ????, ???? ?????: ???? ?????? ???? ????? (????? ???????????, ???????? ???????? ?? ?????) ??????? ?????? ??????? ?/?? ???? ??????, ??????,?????? ??? ???? ?????. ???? ????? ?? ?? ????-?????? ????? ????? ?? ?? ???? ???????.
??? ???? ????? ?????? ?????? ??? ?????? ????? ????? ???? ????? ????? ????? ??? ?????? ?????? ????? ???? : ????-???????-???????-?????? ???? . ?? ??? ????? ?????? ?? ?? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ??????? ???????. ???? ????? ?????/?????? ????? ????? ?????? ?????? ?? ?????? ????? ?? ???? ????/?????? ?? ?? ????? ???? ?????, ?????, ?? ?? ?????? “?????” ??????. ?? ???? “??????” ????? ?????? ??? ????? ?”? ????? ???? ???? ?????? ?? ??????. ???? ?? ?????.
Evolution Derives From Gravity
The quantity of mass in the universe is constant since the universe started its last self-replication, since its last singularity, its last pre-big bang re-birth conception.
All Science Disciplines derive from, start and end, evolve and survive in the direction and manner set by the framework of gravity, the monotheism of the universe. All things, everything in the universe, derive from the gravity of the universe. Every mass format exists, like the universe itself, in one of two states: in an inert state like the material (most probably the gravitons, the elementary particles of the universe) stored in black holes, and in an energetic state, in motion therefore capable of performing work. Due to this mass-energy dualism also the quantity of energy in the universe is constant.
Since the last big-bang all mass formats undergo the same cyclic sequence like the universe itself i.e. birth – evolution – survival – replication. In order to survive and to repeat this sequence every mass format must remain in an energetic state. And since the universe mass/energy quantity is constant there is a melee for it by all mass formats, and the unfortunate formats are swallowed and digested by thefortunate mass formats.
It’s indeed, in fact, an eat or be eaten universe…
Dov Henis (comments from 22nd century)
http://universe-life.com/
http://universe-life.com/2011/07/13/greed-cancer-cells-follow-laws-of-evolution/
============================================================
THE GREAT science feat in 2013 ?? ???? ????? ?????
The 2013 gravity comprehension/definition is the greatest science feat since the early 1920s.
Learn what, scientifically, natural gravity is and what evolution is.
Think of the consequences re classical science of this comprehension of gravity…
??? ???? ????? ?? ????
Origin And Nature of the Universe, the greatest science feat since the early 1920s.
New Science 2013 versus classical science.
Classical Science Is Anticipated/Replaced By The 2013 Gravity Comprehension !!!
http://universe-life.com/2014/02/24/gravity/
Attn classical science hierarchy, including Darwin and Einstein…
“I hope that now you understand what gravity is and why it is the monotheism of the universe…” DH
=================================
Gravity is the natural selection of self-attraction by the elementary particles of an evolving system on their cyclical course towards the re- self-replication of the system. Period
( Gravitons are the elementary particles of the universe. RNA nucleotides genes and serotonin are the elementary particles of Earth life)
?? ??????
?? ?????? ??? ?????? ?????? ???????? ????? ?? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ????? ???????? ???????? ???? ???????. ?????
( ????????? ??? ????? ????? ?? ?????. ?????, ???????????? ?? ????? ???????????, ??????????, ?? ???????? ???????? ?? ??? ???? ????)
Dov Henis(comments from 22nd century)
http://universe-life.com/2013/11/14/subverting-organized-religious-science/
http://universe-life.com/2013/09/03/the-shortest-grand-unified-theory/
http://universe-life.com/2013/09/30/science-adjust-vision-concepts-beyond-aaas-trade-union-religion/
PS: Note, again:
– Classical Science Is Anticipated/Replaced By The 2013 Gravity Comprehension !!!
– Think of the consequences re classical science of this comprehension of gravity…
DH
?.?. ???? ???? ?? ?????? ????? ???? ?????? ????/????/???? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ?????.
?? ?? ??- ????? ?? ???????/?????? ?? ????? ????? ????????? ??????? ?? ???”? ?????? ????? ???????/?????? ?? ??? ?”??????/???” ??????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ???? ?? ?”??????”, ?????? ?? ???? ??????/?????/????? ?? ???? 2013 ???? ???????, ?????? ?? ???? ???????? ?????? ?? ???? ???????. ??-????? ?? ??? ???? ???? ?????? ?????? /????/???? ?? ?????.
??(????? ????? ?-22)
=============================================================================
What would the human world be without god, or without science
(May 1/ 3 2014)
Scientifically natural gravity is the monotheism of the universe.
The reverence- to- god- tradition, religion of the present Western culture, was introduced by Abraham (2117-1942 BCE) from the Casdites-Babylonians, in whom it was evoked by the sight of the apparently “praying” palm trees, with their palm-like leaves, rewarded with “God’s gift”, in Persian “Bagdad” (bag=god, dad=dat hence date-fruit, data= given/gift. This reverence-culture/ tradition was re- adopted by the Jews exiled into Babylonia (586 BCE) , and later adopted also by the Persians who conquered the Babylonian empire, and later adopted also by Alexander , who conquered the Persian empire, and later adopted also by the Greeks and finally adopted from the Greeks also by the Romans and by their following Western world heritage…
– What would a world without god look like?
– What would a world without science look like?
Science = knowledge about or study of the natural world based on facts learned through experiments and observation
God = the perfect and all-powerful spirit or being that is worshipped especially by Christians, Jews, and Muslims as the one who created and rules the universe
a spirit or being that has great power, strength, knowledge, etc., and that can affect nature and the lives of people.
: one of various spirits or beings worshipped in some religions.
Science and god are incompatible. Incompatible.
The present world is a god-believer scienceless world, conducted by ruthlessly competing-for- energy interests , with consequent catastrophes to humanity…
Dov Henis (comments from 22nd century)
http://universe-life.com/
http://universe-life.com/2006/03/12/inception-and-prevalence-of-western-monotheism/
==============================
Rethink, Re-comprehend Evolution
A. From
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/345/6196/526.2.short
Dinosaur Evolution, turning large dinosaurs into small birds
Sacha Vignieri
Most paleontologists agree that birds are descended from dinosaurs. How did such large terrestrial or aquatic animals evolve into small feathered fliers? Lee et al. used two large databases of theropod morphology to explore possible evolutionary patterns that may have driven this dramatic transformation (see the Perspective by Benton). They found no clear pattern of miniaturization across the entire clade of Theropoda.
B. From
http://universe-life.com/2014/07/11/compilation-of-evolutionthe-2013-science-feat-and-humanitys-godscience/
– Gravity is the natural selection of self-attraction by the elementary particles of an evolving system on their cyclical course towards the re- self-replication of the system. Period.
( Gravitons are the elementary particles of the universe. RNA nucleotides genes and serotonin are the elementary particles of Earth life)
– Since the universe mass/energy quantity is constant there is a melee for it by all mass formats, and the unfortunate formats are swallowed and digested by the fortunate mass formats.
It’s indeed, in fact, an eat or be eaten universe…
C. Rethink, Re-comprehend Evolution
The elementary particles of Earth life, ours and of the dinosaurs, are RNA nucleotides genes and serotonin. It is THEIR survival that directs the course of evolution, NOT the survival of their abodes..…
*Note also the up-growth of the palm and banana herbs…
Rethink, Re-comprehend Evolution
Dov Henis (comments from 22nd century)
http://universe-life.com/
http://universe-life.com/2014/07/11/compilation-of-evolutionthe-2013-science-feat-and-humanitys-godscience/
7 Circadian Schmircadian And More Updated Concepts – dovhenis // Oct 31, 2017 at 3:37 am
[…] The question reductionists fear […]
8 Hawking Radiation Simplified, Unmathematified – dovhenis // Oct 31, 2017 at 3:41 am
[…] The question reductionists fear […]
Leave a Comment