Is there a science of history?
The question that causes reductionist scientism to unravel. Note how scientists avoid the question (except the most naive) and skulk away, licked.
The question reductionists fear
September 5th, 2010 · 4 Comments
Tags: General
4 responses so far ↓
1 Dov Henis // Sep 5, 2010 at 2:26 pm
About The Science Of History: It’s The Science Of Distance From The Big Bang Event. Distance, Not Time.
Natural Selection Derives From Cosmic Expansion
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/user/profile/1655.page
“Evolution is energy temporarily constrained in a mass format to postpone reconversion of the mass to the energy fueling the cosmic expansion”.
Source:
Cosmic Evolution Beyond Darwin And Einstein
Natural Selection Derives From Cosmic Expansion
Two suggested editorial items:
I.
Origin And Nature Of Natural Selection
Update Concepts And Comprehension
Life is another mass format.
All mass formats are subject to natural selection.
Natural selection is delaying conversion of mass to energy fueling cosmic expansion.
Cosmic expansion is reconversion of all mass to energy.
Natural Selection Updated 2010
Beyond Historical Concepts
Natural Selection applies to ALL mass formats. Life is just one of them.
Natural Selection Defined:
Natural selection is E (energy) temporarily constrained in an m (mass) format.
Period.
Natural selection is a ubiquitous property of each and every and all cosmic mass, spin array, formats. Mass strives to increase its constrained energy content in attempt to postpone its conversion to energy and the addition of its constitutional energy to the totality of the cosmic energy that keeps fueling the cosmic expansion that goes on since the big bang.
Dov Henis
(Comments From The 22nd Century)
03.2010 Updated Life Manifest
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/54.page#5065
Cosmic Evolution Simplified
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/240/122.page#4427
Gravity Is The Monotheism Of The Cosmos
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/260/122.page#4887
EOTOE, Embarrassingly obvious TOE, expanding the horizon beyond Darwin And Einstein
http://www.molecularfossils.com/2010/05/formal-test-of-theory-of-universal.html
—————————————-
Origin And Nature Of Natural Selection
Longevity Schmongevity Genes
It’s Not The Procedure, But The Concept That Is Absurd
Longevity Genes Search Reflects Science Decadence
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/320/122.page#6368
A. For most centenarians, longevity is written in the DNA.
A study of people who live past 100 reveals many genetic paths to a long life.
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/60772/title/For_most_centenarians%2C_longevity_is_written_in_the_DNA
B. Longevity, survival, natural selection, evolution
- Merriam-Webster OnLine
Longevity = a : a long duration of individual life b : length of life
- Longevity is about survival, which is about “natural selection”, which is about energy constrainment, which is about life evolution, which is about cosmic evolution. Every mass is destined to become energy to fuel the ongoing cosmic expansion. This is why organisms and black holes etc., eat, digest energy in mass forms, to avoid-postpone conversion to energy. This is evolution, which is natural selection, which is survival, which is longevity.
- All mass formats age. Life is a mass format. Searching for longevity genes is searching for evolution genes…
C. The search for longevity genes is a reflection of the 20th-21st centuries science decadence
Its concepts and terminology reflect the abandonment of basic science for adoption of the pretentious cancerous capitalist 20th-21st century technology culture.
Dov Henis
(Comments From The 22nd Century)
II.
Rethink Astronomy And The Universe
even without Quantum Unique Ergodicity, but with plain commonsense
Galactic clusters formed by dispersion, not by conglomeration. The proof of this is their behaviour, including acceleration, as Newtonian bodies.
These bodies formed at the start of inflation, when all energy was still in mass format, and the inflation was the start of reconversion of cosmic mass into energy. Cosmic expansion acceleration rate differs for each galactic cluster, proceeding according to Newton’s laws, proportional to the various galactic clusters’ masses:
Rethink
- A Basic Physics Tenet
- The Universe In Which We Live
A. Neutrino quick-change artist caught in the act
A transformation from one ‘flavor’ to another confirms the elusive elementary particles have mass and suggests a need for new physics.
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/59825/title/Neutrino_quick-change_artist_caught_in_the_act
B. Adopt
- Each and every particle has mass.
- Dark energy and matter YOK.
- Higgs field/particle YOK.
- Do not be afraid of embarrassingly obvious answers. Adopt space-distance in lieu of space-time.
C. And Rethink The Universe
By the presently available data our universe is a dual-cycle array.
One cycle, the present, started from singularity, with all cosmic energy in mass format, and it has been proceeding to reconvert all the mass resolved at the big bang back to energy, by expanding the cosmos, by accelerating away the galaxy clusters.
The other cycle, the cycle that led to singularity, will re-start when the expanding cosmos consumes most or all mass that fuels the expansion. Gravity will then initiate reconversion of all the energy back to mass, to singularity, again.
Dov Henis
(Comments From The 22nd Century)
Cosmic Evolution Simplified
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/240/122.page#4427
Gravity Is The Monotheism Of The Cosmos
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/260/122.page#4887
EOTOE.Embarrassingly obvious expanding horizons beyond Darwin And Einstein.
http://www.molecularfossils.com/2010/05/formal-test-of-theory-of-universal.html
2 Update Comprehension Of Universe/Life Evolution « dovhenis // Jul 18, 2011 at 9:40 am
[...] http://darwiniana.com/2010/09/05/the-question-reductionists-fear/ [...]
3 21st Century Science, Whence And Whither… « dovhenis // Dec 13, 2011 at 11:26 am
[...] http://darwiniana.com/2010/09/05/the-question-reductionists-fear/ [...]
4 Hope For 2011 Science? « dovhenis // Dec 17, 2011 at 4:39 am
[...] “Evolution, Natural Selection, Derive From Cosmic Expansion” http://darwiniana.com/2010/09/05/the-question-reductionists-fear/ [...]
Leave a Comment