Darwiniana

History, Evolution, and The Darwin Debate

Darwiniana header image 2

Evolution texts

November 30th, 2010 · 2 Comments

Pending Textbook Adoption Fans Evolution Debate

Tags: Evolution

2 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Dov Henis // Dec 3, 2010 at 11:04 am

    EOTOE.
    Embarrassingly obvious TOE, expanding the horizon beyond Darwin And Einstein.
    It is spacedistance, NOT spacetime, that does it:

    Theory Of Everything Without Strings Attached.
    Embarrassingly Obvious And Simple.
    See the signature links.

    A. First large-scale formal quantitative test confirms darwin’s theory of universal common ancestry
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/05/100512131513.htm

    However, Life’s genesis was not cells but the first self-reproduction of genes, organisms. Life, we, are just another mass format ingesting energy to temporarily postpone our own energy content fueling the ongoing cosmic expansion.

    Alphabet soup
    http://www.the-scientist.com/2010/7/1/23/1/
    and
    Is Life A Conglomeration Of Mechanisms?
    http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/300/122.page#5864

    Life, all mass formats, originated and exist evolutionarily.

    – Di Mauro has demonstrated a possible rational origin and chemical mechanism of the self-replicating RNA type polymers.

    – Is it human nature, or just “scientist” nature, to accept-prefer the complicated-complex rather than the obvious-rational concept?

    – The signature links present the essence of the Embarrassingly Obvious TOE, the explanation of the energetic drive of EVOLUTION, of all evolutions, of all steps-rungs of all processes, chemical and physical and astronomic and biologic and social etc., arrays.

    Genes’ Expression Modification
    http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/200/122.page#3649

    Life is just one of the mass formats in the universe. Life’s evolution is the ubiquitous cosmic evolution mode. The mode of a gene’s response to the organism culture’s feedback signal, i.e. “replicate without change” or “replicate with change” in case of proven augmented energy constrainment by the offspring, is the mode of Life’s normal evolution, which is the mode of evolution universally, the mode of cosmic evolution.

    B. Since 1997 I have been proposing the following scenario of life’s genesis:

    * Life’s genesis was not cell(s), but the self reproduction of yet uncelled ungenomed gene(s), organisms.

    * There was NOT any “Pre-History Of Life” evolving in an archaic pre-modern life cell.

    * Cells were definitely NOT life’s genesis. Cells are products of evolution of Earth’s primal organisms, of Earth’s first stratum organisms, the RNA genes, that have always been and still are running the show of life, the energy-storing surviving biosphere, since Earth life’s day one.

    * A gene’s, RNA’s, self reproduction was distinctly an evolutionary, enhanced energy constraint event, above probable earlier, random, radiated-energy-induced genes formations.

    * Every evolutionary step is inherently an event of an enhanced energy constraint.

    * Genomes, RNA and DNA, are functional template-organisms evolved by the primary RNA genes-organisms. Cell membranes are functional organs evolved by the RNAs.

    * Life is but one of the many many mass formats in the universe, and its evolution is driven as the evolution of all cosmic mass formats, to ingest energy (mass), to gain temporary enhanced energy constraint, i.e. to survive as long as possible, to temporarily postpone its own energy content fueling the ongoing cosmic expansion.

    Dov Henis
    (Comments From The 22nd Century)
    03.2010 Updated Life Manifest
    http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/54.page#5065
    Cosmic Evolution Simplified
    http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/240/122.page#4427
    Gravity Is The Monotheism Of The Cosmos
    http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/260/122.page#4887

    PS1:
    This Theory Of Everything, with definition of evolution, covers also ALL aspects of anthropology.

    PS2:
    TOE with particles, strings and frames: Religion Or Science?

    A. Since Life is, by our sensory conception, a virtual reality affair, religion is a virtual reality tool for going through life. But I am not religious. My senses are not affected by the strings TOE which, I embarassingly admit, hard as I try I am unable to comprehend.

    B. My concept of TOE is scientific, not religious, based strictly on data recorded and observed, of ubiquitous cosmic phenomena. It does not deal with mechanisms but with the base processes.

    PS3:
    Is life a conglomeration of mechanisms?
    Is the universe a conglomeration of mechanisms?
    Mechanisms there are galore. There’s no end to the number of probable, possible and actual mechanisms of most processes for getting from A to Z. This is true also of the process of reconverting mass to energy, in which we are also actors, the process going on since the Big Bang. The cyclic cosmic process singularity/expanded = all mass/all energy.

    Dov Henis
    (Comments From The 22nd Century)

  • 2 Dov Henis // Oct 27, 2011 at 10:59 am

    An Embarrassingly Obvious Theory Of Everything

    EOTOE, Some Implications (I)

    A.
    EOTOE is an Embarrassingly Obvious Theory Of Everything.

    In essence it states that all things in the universe, nouns and verbs objects and processes, originate and derive from the energy-mass dualism.

    Origin and essence of this derivation are expressed mathematically by

    E=Total[m(1+ D)] (D = distance travelled by mass since singularity)

    Which suggests that the universe cycles between two poles: singularity/all-mass , and maximum-expanded/nearly-all-energy.
    The “nearly” all-energy leaves behind some mass formats that begin consolidating by gravity, when it eventually overcomes expansion as the mass fueling the expansion is nearly depleted, becoming very small m multiplied by very large D = E .

    B.
    Thus the essence/definition of gravitation is:
    “Gravitation Is the propensity of energy reconversion to mass”.

    Gravitation is the “monotheism” and the “ genesis” of the universe. Singularity, at D = 0, is the very brief all-mass pole of the universe. The Big-Bang-inflation did not produce matter or anti-matter. It was the beginning of mass reconversion into energy, of increasing D fueled by decreasing m.

    The conjectured gravitons, smallest basic particles, most probably do exist, but must be with mass, and gravitons microclusters must “big-bang” during the on-going expansion at a resolution of their energy-mass superposition.

    This is rationally commonsensical, therefore it is scientifically probable.
    Inflation started with the whole universe m shattering into fragments that evolved into, became, the galaxy clusters. The clusters expansion is fed at a constant rate by m-fuel. Since expansion accelerates, since the clusters depart from each other at an ever increasing velocity, we learn that the rate of m-to-E reconversion in the universe is constant. The accelerated expansion derives from the ever decreasing m of each cluster.

    C.
    Thus the essence/definition of evolution, natural selection is:
    Mass formats attaining temporary augmented energy constraint in their successive generations, with energy drained from other mass formats, to temporarily postpone, survive, the reversion of their own constitutional mass to the pool of cosmic energy fueling the galactic clusters expansion.

    This explains why black holes and humans, in fact all mass formats, must feed themselves in order to survive.
    This explains that the essence of quantum mechanics of all processes is the detailed procession steps, the evolution details, between physical states ordained for natural selection.

    D.
    Thus comes to light the universe inspected progressively in greater detail.
    Science reveals the universe’s nature-scope and directing drive, followed by technology studying its evolution details-aspects, followed by engineering exploitation of the attained information. This suggests the specific weight, importance, of science, technology and engineering in considering of research or enterprise plans and implementation.

    Dov Henis (comments from 22nd century)
    http://universe-life.com/

    PS1:
    Definitely: Dark energy and dark matter YOK! Universe’s m reconverts to E at a constant rate…
    Universe accelerated expansion is per Newton’s motion laws, obviously…
    Also, universe physics constants should vary, probably slightly, between galaxies clusters due to different clusters sizes…
    Also, the clusters formed by dispersion at inflation…

    PS2:
    The singularity constituents must have been the smallest elementary particles. They may be designated gravitons, but they MUST HAVE MASS. They were born at the energy-mass superposition resolution, together with the fragments that became galaxies clusters.
    At expansion D increases, therefore m decreases, which per Newton mandates mass and matter acceleration. This goes on, most probably, at a constant rate of mass-to-energy reconversion, at an energy-mass resolution, mandated by the equality of both sides of the top equation.. And this resolution is, for each graviton, most probably in a format of a minuscule big-bang.

    This is a lesser fantasy than the dark matter and energy fantasy. Such mass-energy gravitons may be omnipresent within each galaxies cluster, maintaining each cluster as a primordial Newtonian body and being the fuel-driver of expansion.
    DH
    http://universe-life.com/2011/10/14/eot … cations-2/
    ==============================

    EOTOE, Some Implications (II)

    This equation describes the presently expanding universe:

    E=Total[m(1 + D)] D = distance travelled by mass since singularity

    This equation describes the future contracting universe:

    E=Total[m(1 – D)] D = distance travelled by mass since end expansion

    Implications:

    The base units of mass – may be designated gravitons but MUST have mass – are not temporal, they never disappear.

    In the present expanding universe they are in motion as mD away from the singularity point.
    Those of them that hit a whatever mass format and move it become inert. This will go on until all or nearly all of them cease moving forward, i.e. until D ceases growing.

    When D ceases growing gravitation will overcome the inertial motion away from the singularity point and will start pulling them back towards it. It is then that -D will replace +D, to maintain the equation’s equality…

    And MORE, MUCH MORE:

    The rational commonsensical, and therefore scientifically probable, implication is that Space is imbued with these massed gravitons that are continuously left behind during Expansion… also as micro clusters sized between gravitons and neutrinos…

    Dov Henis (comments from 22nd century)
    http://universe-life.com/
    http://universe-life.com/2011/10/07/eot … cations-i/

    =========================

    EOTOE, Some Implications (III)

    Classically:

    Energy = dynamic quality, the capacity of acting or being active, a fundamental entity of nature that is transferred between componentsts of a system in the production of physical change within the system and usually regarded as the capacity for doing work.

    Mass = Mass is the quantity of inertia possessed by an object or the proportion between force and acceleration referred to in Newton’s Second Law of Motion.

    Per EOTOE :

    E=Total[m(1 + D)] D = distance travelled by mass since singularity

    Energy is mass in motion.

    The mass of the universe is either in motion or in the form of inert massed gravitons, with which the universe is imbued.

    m of the EOTOE equation is only the energetic m, the m which is in motion.

    The inert gravitons do not play a role in the E,m,D relationship. At the (present) universe expansion phase mass reconverts to energy at a constant rate, leaving behind inert gravitons. Inert gravitons become energetically active when they are reset in motion, i.e. when acted upon by energy, such as by gravity during the universe re-contraction phase.

    Dov Henis (comments from the 22nd century)

    http://universe-life.com

Leave a Comment