01.15.11
Booknotes: The 10K Year Explosion
The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution
After the Boskop book I am starting to look at this book, again one that am familiar with, in part because of the Ashkenazi IQ nonsense that is promoted here.
I already have a prior problem with this book (whose general intent, however, I support as an exploration, fascinating book), which is the Darwinian confusion that selectionist processes constitute evolution. That fallacy sinks the book. The real dynamic of evolution, that I have explored and point to in World History and the Eonic Effect, confirms the authors’ thesis that evolution is continuing in history, but this with an entirely different dynamic, the grand eonic sequence visible in world history as the ‘eonic effect’, so-called. This non-genetic macroevolutionary process is crucial for understanding history, and, I suspect, human evolution in general. But Darwinists are too far gone to grasp anything, and that is why I challenge the authors’ dangerous eugenic sociobiological thinking about Jews at the end of the book. Please note that an argument by eugenics, cleaned of anti-semitism, is going to backfire and become almost more dangerous than the whacko brands known to us: we already see it in the chauvinist Judaistic culture of ‘smart Jews’ with its concealed Nietzchean agenda of future evolutionary genocide of dumb gentiles. If you have never collided with that, good, but be careful. What??? “Are you kidding?” No, actually. Look at Palestine, and you will see the early stages of that in action. It needs to be challenged.
In any case the argument that Askhenazis by some kind of commerical natural selection increased their IQ is a dubious argument, that mainstream Darwinists should have rejected on the spot, since it posits a considerable ‘evolution’ in a few centuries, and ignores the many many similar situations in history that didn’t have this kind of result. I could be wrong, but I find this oddly off. Still, this thinking, if put in quarantine, is interesting speculation. But, again, I am suspicious. Recent texts claim that Ashkenazis are the smartest cultural group known, but that is not what used to be claimed by the IQ gang. The North Europeans, of many varieties, were once said to be quite the equals here, if not a shade smarter. Not one Beethoven has appeared in Jewish lines, etc.. (So what, some might say)
The omission of this from discussion is odd, and worrisome, and suggests a wish to Darwinize the argument.
And in this context the history of the Ashkhenazis is highly suggestive of an alternate hypothesis. The highest intelligence was long, we suspect, found among Indo-Europeans (this could be wrong, btw, and I for one, as with today’s Boskop post, think early man had some very smart people), and then we find the Ashkhenazis who have twice intersected and blended with these people, first in Caucasus, then in Germany, to be par on this question. I am suspicious that Askkhenazis are a hybrid group, whose natural selections may indeed have spread the smarts of the Indo-Europeans through their ranks in a short time, given the already high level of the starting stock.
Jews need to wake up and be wary here, because their smarts has been overestimated, and it is highly unbalanced, I suspect. I watch Jews constantly take their stupidies as ‘smart’ since they are said to be smarter than others, and fall in the trap. We have seen that precisely in the economic realm where the smart-stupid combo in the wake of that idiot Ayn Rand have made a mockery IQ versus real intelligence.
They have prospered statistically in economic and cultural minor leagues, but they have contributed almost nothing basic to modernity, Einstein et al apart: look at the early modern and the immense explosion of gentile intelligence (I didnt’ say IQ) that produced an entire new civilization. Then compare that to the thin soup of the very smart Karl Marx, etc.. You could obviously argue that the innovation period was all over and then let the Jews out of the ghetto, but the Jews seem more adept at culture-carry as everything goes into decline than in culture creation, which was almost entirely the gentile explosion from the Reformation to the Enlightenment. Gentiles need to be wary of Jews here who will dumb them down as an inferior species. That is nonsense. The basic intelligence that has created a new civilization is proof of that, so don’t let dangerous Jews teachers train you stupid, an effect sadly in evidence at the current time.
The whole problem will solve itself in a few generations, as the new blended population emerges, no doubt.
The latter argument may be full of holes, but we need to stop being conned by Jewish propaganda (what to say of Gentile), with its hidden Nietzschean agenda to slaughter the dumb gentiles to create a new race. Not! The Jews would never get away with it, so we should shelve this thinking for the nonce. But the misleading views of Nietzsche are common in Jews (and were fueled by the idiocy of Walter Kauffman, who first rescued Nietzsche, but doing so with a cover up of the real man).
Look at Darwinism: if Jews are so smart why are they the dumbest Darwinian fanatics? They are smart enough to excel in academic Darwinism, but like Gould they fumble at the paradigm boundary.
Gentiles are hardly better!!!
This is all highly toxic and dangerous stuff: critique at will, but don’t let the authors of this book off the hook. And don’t stand for Jewish IQ propaganda: note the sad reality. As Gentiles go decadent and Jewish meritocracty flowers, modern culture goes into decline. So much for IQ.
Let me note the obvious correlation of Jewish history with the eonic effect, in the emergence of monotheism. This sweeping tide of the Axial Age is a must for understanding Jews and Christians. These arguments about the medieval natural selection of sharp business types is concealed Social Darwinist propaganda.
In the next post we will describe the ultimate IQ test, somthing more than the business capitalist pseudo-smarts now all too visible in the wreckage of the American economy, with all too many Jewish signatures (along with a lot of help from Gentiles idiots). Gentiles smart??? Nah.
BTW, these are remarks that I have discussed with Jews over coffee, so they are not anti-semitic whatsoever.
Darwiniana » Eurasia, or Afro-Eurasia, or Afro-America-Eurasia? said,
January 29, 2011 at 3:09 pm
[...] http://darwiniana.com/2011/01/15/booknotes-the-10k-year-explosion/comment-page-1/#comment-356193 [...]
nemo said,
January 29, 2011 at 3:12 pm
The issues are easy to solve: cf the top level post citing your comment.
Darwiniana » Repost: more on Eurasia, or Afro-Eurasia, or Afro-America-Eurasia? said,
January 30, 2011 at 1:45 pm
[...] Eurasia, or Afro-Eurasia, or Afro-America-Eurasia? http://darwiniana.com/2011/01/15/booknotes-the-10k-year-explosion/comment-page-1/#comment-356193 This post was an opportunity to show a side of the eonic effect that often stumps readers. I [...]