07.10.11
A Kantian paradox, the ‘causality of freedom’
http://history-and-evolution.com/whee4th/chap3_4.htm
Even as we pursue ‘free will’ demonstrations, the study of the idea of free agency in history leads us to the classic paradox of the philosophy of history: what causes free will? Kant’s famous essay unwittingly stumbles on this paradox, and we left to puzzle over a contradition. The resolution can be seen in the eonic effect where the issue of ‘causality’ becomes a more general issue of the evolution of free will.
And the data shows us a dramatic example out front in the relationship of causal issues to the emergence of democracy, a surprise indeed.
Darwinists are so confused, so stuck, so retarded by their whole framework that this question becomes impossible to explain.
Whatever concept one may hold, from a metaphysical point of view, concerning the freedom of the will, certainly its appearances, which are human actions, like every other natural event, are determined by universal laws. However obscure their causes, history, which is concerned with narrating these appearances, permits us to hope that if we attend to the play of freedom of the human will in the large, we may be able to discern a regular movement in it, and that what seems complex and chaotic in the single individual may be seen from the standpoint of the human race as a whole to be a steady and progressive though slow evolution of its original endowment