11.25.11
Coyne on Margulis
http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2011/11/24/rip-lynn-margulis-ctd/
And then there were her views that the 9/11 destruction in New York was due not to an act of terrorism but to deliberately set bombs. In the video below she explains this crazy idea, and you can read her essay about it here.
It is Coyne who discredits himself with this statement. Margulis’ thinking here shows courage, given the universal muddle in academia on the question. Coyne et al. harp endlessly about science. So consider the science of the 9/11 controversies. The official account is nonsense.
reece sullivan said,
November 25, 2011 at 5:04 pm
I’m curious what the HIV/AIDs denial thing is about . . . and if anyone thinks there’s anything to it. Opinions, anyone?
JZ said,
November 26, 2011 at 7:13 am
Coyne is strange here: he would be better off not saying anything. That someone like Margulis was a 9/11 skeptic of the official story is going to make more doubters than believers.
Is Coyne even sincere on this?
nemo said,
November 26, 2011 at 1:53 pm
Not sure what you mean?
Sybil Adams said,
December 18, 2011 at 2:43 pm
reece,
It is about spirochetes–going into dormant round bodies. MArgulis wasw NOT an AIDS ‘denalist’–her claim was/is that HIV does not cause AIDS.
You can check out the paper: SYMBIOSIS (2009) 47, 51–58