01.27.12
The Darwin conspiracy?
The term is the title of Roy Davies’ book (see the sidebar for links), but the more general meaning of the term suggests that there is an active effort to impose Darwinism on culture, despite the behind the scenes awareness of the problems with the theory.
The debunking of Darwinism, like the 9/11 conspiracy theories so depicted yesterday, have reached the point of no return: you can’t really expect people to accept the official brand/version without deception. Well, not quite, yet. The problem is that people are usually in total confusion, will accept anything on the basis of science authority, and don’t sense anomalies.
But the reality remains that the massive dissent against the Paradigm, albeit too much on the right, and its action in the schools, has created a situation where the official science version requires dissembling by its proponents. That’s a fatal stage, and a sign that the pretense of propaganda can’t be maintained.
Darwinists have made the issue simple, such is their oversimplified stance.
Huxley’s Contradiction And Evolution #1 and #2
The problem with Darwinism is very simple, and Huxley stumbled on it: the science to be science must reject the fact/value dichotomy. But any real theory of evolution must embrace it.
Theoretical Self-Defense
The standard view of evolution is so intimidating for most secularists that they fail to see how transparent the problems are.