The stance of the Cosmos series on evolution is going to be a fatal flaw. The attempt by the ID group to lead that critique will confuse the issue. The day has passed however when scientists can pass of straight darwinism and be believable. What is needed is not acknowledgment of ‘Intelligent Design’ but an understanding of where the darwin paradigm fails. You can’t dish up the same old same old on darwinism (often couched behind ‘evolution’ as a cover term) and be believable. That means scientists are getting to be unbelievable, which must mean actually lying. so much for science.