Darwiniana

History, Evolution, and The Darwin Debate

Darwiniana header image 2

Bennett and surviving skepticism…and the survival of Samkhya

July 4th, 2015 · 3 Comments

I am of two minds as to the commentary on Bennett, a preoccupation of a earlier period of my life, but now a casualty of later greater skepticism…However, the work has an imaginary edition as a set of brilliant fragments, and I think we have cited one bit and in the process solved (or unsolved) the riddle of monotheism. But this work is the object of predatory interests from vulture sufis and the plan to use humanity as ‘food for the gods’ has by no means died. I think that the left should enter here in a commando raid and expose this gross deviation of godly subjects with cannibal motives.
In the end sufis will be wards of the future communist left–I see no other outcome possible with these spiritual felons of long standing….
Bennett’s work is a classic upgrade already of the classic Samkhya and for this the book will persist in order to carry this into a new future…(maybe)

Tags: General

3 responses so far ↓

  • 1 NK // Jul 4, 2015 at 5:37 pm

    I think you should proceed here. To be honest, the blog was getting a little boring (politics and economics aren’t my main interests).

  • 2 nemo // Jul 5, 2015 at 11:46 am

    Welcome back. You are absolutely right.This blog has fifty thousand posts, who wouldn’t get a bit boring…I am going to produce some booklets of a historical record.
    But if you want issues beyond politics and economics I will try to avail…
    I am currently considering issues of the mindfulness movements, Advaita, the future of buddhism, and anything else: you can raise some topics yourself…

  • 3 nemo // Jul 5, 2015 at 1:22 pm

    http://www.amazon.com/Living-Devil-Stephen-Batchelor/dp/1594480877/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1436116907&sr=8-1&keywords=devil+buddhism

    Consider this tricky book which I don’t agree with in general or in specific….

Leave a Comment