History, Evolution, and The Darwin Debate

Darwiniana header image 2

‘Design’ in world history and the double confusions of religion and science

July 20th, 2015 · No Comments


The study in WHEE steers clear of the design argument, mostly, but has a quiet side show looking at the issue. The crux of the design argument is that religious examples fail while the basic issue of design persists to challenge scientists. The best approach to the question would be for scientists to adopt design arguments to be able to help relgionists debrief their own. But we can infer design with no easy way to prove the result. That is a Kantian no win situation. But it would help if scientists could stop peddling he darwin fraud to try and dogmatize on the subject of religion.
The text of WHEE shows an overwhelming design in world history, but nothing in religious design arguments can get it right. And science is so flatfooted it can’t deal with anything beyond rank scientism.

A pretty dismal state of affairs…

Tags: General

0 responses so far ↓

  • There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.

Leave a Comment