Darwiniana

History, Evolution, and The Darwin Debate

Darwiniana header image 2

Is it possible to redefine terms, construct a failsafed/self-correcting socialism?

December 11th, 2017 · No Comments

The question of Chinese ‘communism’, Putin and Russia: we have constantly suggested the need for a radial break with the legacy marxist formations claiming to represent social futurism.
Clearly that is a part of the reason for a stalled left: to what are you referring. We cannot propose a neo-communism unless we are specific about the kind of society proposed with a kind of built-in failsafe of self-correction process that can respond to stalinist outcomes. We need to make clear that we are not endorsing ‘said communism’ as with the chinese fake, and the Russian CIA mess.
Is it possible to redefine terms, construct a failsafed/self-correcting socialism?
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/putins-no-mastermind-hes-barely-clinging-to-power-to-avoid-saddam-husseins-fate-reporter/

Vladimir Putin made a risky bet to interfere in the U.S. election — and it paid off handsomely — but reporter Julia Ioffe says the Russian president is playing blackjack rather than geopolitical chess.

Tags: General

0 responses so far ↓

  • There are no comments yet...Kick things off by filling out the form below.

Leave a Comment