<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Darwiniana &#187; Search Results  &#187;  rajneesh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://darwiniana.com/?s=rajneesh&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://darwiniana.com</link>
	<description>History, Evolution, and the Darwin Debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:18:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Comment on Grayling on Dalai Lama</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2010/06/19/comment-on-grayling-on-dalai-lama/</link>
		<comments>http://darwiniana.com/2010/06/19/comment-on-grayling-on-dalai-lama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=46899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comment on Grayling on Dalai Lama
The field of mysticism is littered with a lot of wreckage, but your basic point is quite right: there is real common core to religions along these lines.
An appropriate stick with which to beat the New Atheists over the head.
As Rajneesh suggested, Jesus was unenlightened in life, but entered that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://darwiniana.com/2010/06/19/comment-on-grayling-on-dalai-lama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rajneesh, Jainism, and the invention of atheism by religion</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2010/06/05/rajneesh-jainism-and-the-invention-of-atheism-by-religion/</link>
		<comments>http://darwiniana.com/2010/06/05/rajneesh-jainism-and-the-invention-of-atheism-by-religion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 18:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=46223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I mentioned Rajneesh in the previous post because, however controversial or discredited he might seem now, he actually pointed to (without any explicit reference) the real history of atheism, which was religious, visible in the traditioin of Jainism, then Buddhism.
The question of the god obsession is a very late creation of the Israelite Axial Age [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://darwiniana.com/2010/06/05/rajneesh-jainism-and-the-invention-of-atheism-by-religion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An ungodly debate</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2010/06/05/an-ungodly-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://darwiniana.com/2010/06/05/an-ungodly-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 18:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=46221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An ungodly debate
Perhaps never before in history have science and religion been engaged in such dubious battle. The increasingly challenging claims of science &#8211; including that of being able to create life itself &#8211; have invited the inevitable backlash of a militant religiosity &#8230; 
Asked about the paedophilia scandal currently sweeping the Catholic church, biologist [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://darwiniana.com/2010/06/05/an-ungodly-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bringing Richard Dawkins to justice</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2010/05/11/bringing-richard-dawkins-to-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://darwiniana.com/2010/05/11/bringing-richard-dawkins-to-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 21:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=44924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bringing the Vatican to Justice
Sam Harris picks up on the &#8216;arrest the Pope&#8217; nonsense.
I think that this theme should be explicated by the original version, from the ashram of Rajneesh in the seventies and eighties, whose concern was the urgent need to hasten the passing of the religious traditions of celibacy, which are evident in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://darwiniana.com/2010/05/11/bringing-richard-dawkins-to-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After Religion Fizzles, You’re Stuck With Kant</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2010/05/10/after-religion-fizzles-you%e2%80%99re-stuck-with-kant/</link>
		<comments>http://darwiniana.com/2010/05/10/after-religion-fizzles-you%e2%80%99re-stuck-with-kant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 17:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=44825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a little puzzled by Hedges&#8217; column this week: After Religion Fizzles, We’re Stuck With Nietzsche
An unfortunate piece of indirection, irony, or stupidity from a journalist I have followed for some time. What&#8217;s up here. Has Mr. Hedges lost his faith? Is he trying to get market share from the Dawkins groupies? 
What is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://darwiniana.com/2010/05/10/after-religion-fizzles-you%e2%80%99re-stuck-with-kant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s prosecute Richard Dawkins for promoting Social Darwinism</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2010/04/24/lets-prosecute-richard-dawkins-for-promoting-social-darwinism/</link>
		<comments>http://darwiniana.com/2010/04/24/lets-prosecute-richard-dawkins-for-promoting-social-darwinism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=43983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bring the Pope to Justice
by Christopher Hitchens &#8211; Newsweek
http://richarddawkins.net/articles/5489
This is Hitchens at his most idiotic. The irony here is that it was Rajneesh who first demanded the prosecution of the Pope.
Hitchens&#8217; denial of the existence of buddhist enlightenment in the passage on the Rajneesh ashram which he visited (drunk) as a BBC reporter in his [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://darwiniana.com/2010/04/24/lets-prosecute-richard-dawkins-for-promoting-social-darwinism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deja vu all over again, the new atheists&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2010/04/17/deja-vu-all-over-again-the-new-atheists/</link>
		<comments>http://darwiniana.com/2010/04/17/deja-vu-all-over-again-the-new-atheists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=43666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am struck by deja vu confronted with the New Atheist attack on the pope, and on Christianity in general. It is a washed out version of the Rajneesh version of the eighties in Oregon: Rajneeshism Bible (Rajneesh Bible) (Paperback)
The book (which comes in four volumes, and probably is unattainable) is the most ferocious attack [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://darwiniana.com/2010/04/17/deja-vu-all-over-again-the-new-atheists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pope is a fraud, but Dawkins Darwinism is far worse than catholicism</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2010/04/17/the-pope-is-a-fraud-but-dawkins-darwinism-is-far-worse-than-catholicism/</link>
		<comments>http://darwiniana.com/2010/04/17/the-pope-is-a-fraud-but-dawkins-darwinism-is-far-worse-than-catholicism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=43664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Ruse&#8230;.
The current attack on Catholicism is in many ways a parody (but no doubt par for the course anyway) of the eighties attack on Christianity in the Rajneesh world, and the New Age movement. But there is an important difference: those critiques had an understanding of the issues of religion and its history, where [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://darwiniana.com/2010/04/17/the-pope-is-a-fraud-but-dawkins-darwinism-is-far-worse-than-catholicism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dawkins vs the Pope: playing to the New Atheist peanut gallery</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2010/04/16/dawkins-vs-the-pope-playing-to-the-new-atheist-peanut-gallery/</link>
		<comments>http://darwiniana.com/2010/04/16/dawkins-vs-the-pope-playing-to-the-new-atheist-peanut-gallery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=43618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does Richard Dawkins Think He’s Napoleon?
Dawkins is clever at promoting his New Atheism movement, but, while I hold not brief for the Pope, have to wonder at the absurdity of their current round of tactics. Actually, such tactics play very well with his base, and will energize the Dawkins peanut gallery.
But the sad fact is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://darwiniana.com/2010/04/16/dawkins-vs-the-pope-playing-to-the-new-atheist-peanut-gallery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hitchens on ten commandments</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/2010/03/05/hitchens-on-ten-commandments/</link>
		<comments>http://darwiniana.com/2010/03/05/hitchens-on-ten-commandments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nemo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Booknotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darwiniana.com/?p=41792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Commandments by Christopher Hitchens &#8211; Vanity Fair
Thanks to Florian for the link. 
http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2010/04/hitchens-201004
Once again Hitchens imitates the guru Rajneesh. Go read Rajneesh&#8217;s The Rajneesh Bible here. 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://darwiniana.com/2010/03/05/hitchens-on-ten-commandments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
