<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Darwiniana: blogzone</title>
	<link>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone</link>
	<description>Commenters' blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Wallace has interesting take on Darwinism by Stephen P. Smith</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/08/02/wallace-has-interesting-take-on-darwinism/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen P. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 04:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/08/02/wallace-has-interesting-take-on-darwinism/#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Wallace is not here denying the facts of evolution (apparent variation and natural selection in life’s struggle for existence). Wallace agrees with Darwin, but then does something Darwin has never done: Wallace notes that natural selection is provisional, Wallace notes that natural selection is context dependent and comes with a precondition that underwrites our very words and consciousness itself. Natural selection build from a framework of necessary law and random variation is found depending on an unspecified precondition: the sample space and the fitness landscape is taken for granted. But the starkness cannot be denied, even as nature finds itself only caricatured by Darwin’s theory. Wallace knew there was something beyond the simplistic caricature offered by Darwin, and so it is not surprising that Wallace was not disappointed in Darwin taking credit for natural selection. Wallace is closer to being Trinitarian, as the apparent subject-object unity is very apparent is his concluding remarks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wallace is not here denying the facts of evolution (apparent variation and natural selection in life’s struggle for existence). Wallace agrees with Darwin, but then does something Darwin has never done: Wallace notes that natural selection is provisional, Wallace notes that natural selection is context dependent and comes with a precondition that underwrites our very words and consciousness itself. Natural selection build from a framework of necessary law and random variation is found depending on an unspecified precondition: the sample space and the fitness landscape is taken for granted. But the starkness cannot be denied, even as nature finds itself only caricatured by Darwin’s theory. Wallace knew there was something beyond the simplistic caricature offered by Darwin, and so it is not surprising that Wallace was not disappointed in Darwin taking credit for natural selection. Wallace is closer to being Trinitarian, as the apparent subject-object unity is very apparent is his concluding remarks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Epigenetics: behavior impacts on future inheritance by Epigenetics: behavior impacts on future inheritance &#124; lowerautoinsurance</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/07/29/epigenetics-behavior-impacts-on-future-inheritance/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Epigenetics: behavior impacts on future inheritance &#124; lowerautoinsurance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/07/29/epigenetics-behavior-impacts-on-future-inheritance/#comment-165</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Stephen P. Smith [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Original post by Stephen P. Smith [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Camelina as Biofuel by Darwiniana &#187; Blogzone: biofuel</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/07/28/camelina-as-biofuel/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwiniana &#187; Blogzone: biofuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/07/28/camelina-as-biofuel/#comment-164</guid>
		<description>[...] Camelina as biofuel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Camelina as biofuel [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Belief in rules and laws, not unlike natural selection, linked to autism by Leslie Feldman</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/07/25/belief-in-rules-and-laws-not-unlike-natural-selection-linked-to-autism/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Feldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/07/25/belief-in-rules-and-laws-not-unlike-natural-selection-linked-to-autism/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>You are talking about familial autism which could be made worse by older paternal age.

One of the major causes of the rise in non-familial autism is older paternal age. Childhood schizophrenia is also caused, in many non-familial cases by de novo mutations in sperm stem cells.   http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,23849196-5000117,00.html

http://www.schizophreniaforum.org/for/curr/Malaspina/default.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are talking about familial autism which could be made worse by older paternal age.</p>
<p>One of the major causes of the rise in non-familial autism is older paternal age. Childhood schizophrenia is also caused, in many non-familial cases by de novo mutations in sperm stem cells.   <a href="http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,23849196-5000117,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,23849196-5000117,00.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.schizophreniaforum.org/for/curr/Malaspina/default.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.schizophreniaforum.org/for/curr/Malaspina/default.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Can Sorghum save us? by Darwiniana &#187; Blogzone: sorghum</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/07/24/can-surghum-gave-us/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwiniana &#187; Blogzone: sorghum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/07/24/can-surghum-gave-us/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>[...] Can Sorghum save us [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Can Sorghum save us [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Theory depends on politics for its acceptance by Darwiniana &#187; Blogzone: theory and politics</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/07/22/theory-depends-on-politics-for-its-acceptance/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwiniana &#187; Blogzone: theory and politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/07/22/theory-depends-on-politics-for-its-acceptance/#comment-157</guid>
		<description>[...] Theory depends on politics for its acceptance [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Theory depends on politics for its acceptance [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Natural selection unable to optimize by Darwiniana &#187; Blogzone: natural selection unable to optimize</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/07/18/natural-selection-unable-to-optimize/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwiniana &#187; Blogzone: natural selection unable to optimize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/07/18/natural-selection-unable-to-optimize/#comment-156</guid>
		<description>[...] here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] here [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Singing toadfish by Darwiniana &#187; Blogzone: singing toadfish</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/07/17/singing-toadfish/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwiniana &#187; Blogzone: singing toadfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/07/17/singing-toadfish/#comment-155</guid>
		<description>[...] Singing toadfish [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Singing toadfish [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mars photos by Darwiniana &#187; Blogzone: Mars photos</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/07/16/mars-photos/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwiniana &#187; Blogzone: Mars photos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/07/16/mars-photos/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>[...] Mars Photos [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Mars Photos [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My review of Kauffman&#8217;s &#8220;Reinventing the Sacred&#8221; by Darwiniana &#187; Blogzone: book review of Kauffman</title>
		<link>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/07/10/my-review-of-kauffmans-reinventing-the-sacred/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwiniana &#187; Blogzone: book review of Kauffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://darwiniana.com/blogzone/2008/07/10/my-review-of-kauffmans-reinventing-the-sacred/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>[...] Hucklebird reviews Reinventing The Sacred [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Hucklebird reviews Reinventing The Sacred [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
