The eonic effect: bailing out of neo-darwinism
A new file on the eonic effect, and the third edition: World History
And The Eonic Effect, Civilization, Darwinism, And Theories of Evolution
Third Edition
We have a secret here at Darwiniana: we know Darwinian thinking is wrong, because we have a reality check, a ‘glimpse of evolution’, that can tell us instantly where standard reductionism goes wrong. Nor is there any license given to the design alternative. http://eonic-effect.net
The result is not ‘another theory’ but a framework for observing historical evolution in its great complexity, in a condition of some wonder!
The meaning of evolution has been lowballed by Darwinists and the generation of current science. It can only try to ape the ‘laws of physics’ with a ‘law of evolution’. There is no such law, such as that of natural selection. The emphasis on natural selection is a complete fantasy, as can be seen easily by looking at the eonic effect.
It is hard to accept that the people who are experts in physics, in medicine, in technological innovation could be so off the mark on evolution, but that’s the case. We have to come to terms with this fact, or we will effectively destroy modern civilization. No use whining over creationism. The idiots (though not barbarians) are at the gates. If the professionals of science at this stuck on a nineteenth century theory culture is going to move on in a new direction, with a vengeance. Time is up here. All that is required is an admission of ignorance, and a willingness to stop hyping a theory as violent as Darwin’s.
The eonic model brings evolution into history. How can that be? Isn’t that cokeyed? Not at all. Why? Because we recalibrate the meaning of evolution around a powerful data set that gives a much better interpretation of ‘evolution’. That data set is the ‘eonic effect’, a non-random pattern in world history, a most remarkable discovery.
The net effect here is to create a buffer between deep time and the history of man: world history shows its own ‘evolution’ and this can never be reduced to genetics.
Darwinists have gone to sleep, and into automatic mode. They have done something dangerous, created a monopoly of opinion and belief as impregnable as that of religion, and will still be peddling their nonsense a century from now. Everyone else has a need, and an obligation, to pass beyond its frozen paradigm game. We owe such a deceptive paradigm, and such a dishonest group of scientists, nothing whatever, leastwise the label of scientific expertise. By not being an expert, you have a residual common sense that can outflank the cadre of brainwashed experts whose livelihood depends on the deception. This deception has become internalized, and hides behind the fine words of scientific high talk.
The Altenberg 2008 gives us hints that many creative scientists have jettisoned the ’synthesis’, wary of the dangers of doing so in public, but finally unable to continue the deception any longer.
But the Altenberg indications, e.g. the emphasis on ’self-organization’, or other perspectives, are not sufficient. Self-organization is a description of what evolution does, not yet a theory. The eonic effect automatically fulfills the requirement, or the label, but that explains nothing.
The model of the eonic effect is not ‘another theory’ but a framework to observe something, something quite stupendously large, whose study will make the real meaning of evolution intuitive, to the degree that we can visualize such a large-scale process (not easy).
This approach almost certianly applies to earlier human evolution, although we don’t need to claim any such thing to proceed.
This is in many ways the answer to Huxley who realized finally something was wrong somewhere with Darwinism. As he noted we contradict Darwinism in practice. Why is that? It is because there must be a secondary evolution somewhere that we had missed. The eonic effect gives us a glimpse of what we missed.