What is the ‘eonic effect’ and why does noone understand what is being talked about?

https://www.dropbox.com/home/Public?preview=WHEE_abrdg_kindle_johnlandon_PDF2A.pdf
The ‘eonic effect’ is one of the most exciting discoveries in the study of world history and evolutionary science, but unfortunately its study has made little headway in the public domain, for reasons that are not hard to find.

If we even reference the subject we are referring to something that simply does’t register in terms of standard categories. At least to first sight. The basic idea is not that hard in principle but if you had never seen an elephant you might balk at some attempt to describe it. (there is a famous story about that).
The ‘eonic effect’ is a non-random structure in world history…there we go, what does that mean?
Beyond that the subject is almost a private possession of speed readers: to make statements about civilizations requires the communicant also be a speed reader, which is not to be hoped for. Who has time to read hundred of books about different periods/places of world history? Even specialists don’t read enough, at least not in a general field of world history. They specialize! And we can’t really visualize the ‘evolution of a civilization’, it is too vast. But, wait, we do that all the time: we ‘visualize the ‘decline and fall’ of the middle ages, so our statement isn’t quite right. But what we must do is far vaster than that.
Next, the fact remains that most people are prisoners of the propagandas promoted by politicians, and the academic myths promoted by academics (witness the strength of the Darwin paradigm). And here the ‘eonic effect’ material gets unlucky, politicians, theologians, darwinists, most academics, and a lot of other dogma upholders are so hostile, yet fearful, they will not even dare refute/challenge what is claimed: they must totally ignore it.

There is more here, but we have made our point. The fact remains that the eonic effect should be the intellectual property of the general public. History is not what conventional thinking leads you to believe. We have already had this fight with Darwinism: evolution, its theory, is not what conventional science has led you to believe. But the critics won the argument, but so far have lost the war. Politicians and academic tend to decree what you are believe, so the fight will result in not much.

Fortunately the material on the eonic effect doesn’t require a theory and we can state the issues empirically in a way that is beyond falsification, it is just a way of saying, Look! So it is possible to consider an abbreviated version hypothetically and then begin to study world history to see the data that is there and known.

what should scare christians, jews, moslems (and buddhists)…//What scares the new atheists | John Gray 

—————–
The vocal fervour of today’s missionary atheism conceals a panic that religion is not only refusing to decline – but in fact flourishing

Source: What scares the new atheists | John Gray | World news | The Guardian

The New Atheists set themselves up for discombobulation on many grounds and have been subject to many critics, not least here John Gray who is actually quite interesting in the midst of his gross errors (he can’t seem to disentangle from darwinism, poor thing). Continue reading what should scare christians, jews, moslems (and buddhists)…//What scares the new atheists | John Gray 

HuffPost’s Attack on Academic Integrity, Truth and Justice – Global Research

thanks to Mazur for link
I am more shocked by HuffPost’s stance on 9/11 than HuffPost is on the whole question. How could that ezine be so corrupted by propaganda on this question? It is almost silly, or would be if powerful something was at work. That’s a real question: I am a bit baffled by the dynamics of this fixation on 9/11 so-called conspiracy theories. We noted the way it has misled Chomsky and that has put a chill even on the left. Continue reading HuffPost’s Attack on Academic Integrity, Truth and Justice – Global Research

Scientists discover how birds and dinosaurs evolved to dazzle with colourful displays — ScienceDaily

Iridescence is responsible for some of the most striking visual displays in the animal kingdom. Now, thanks to a new study of feathers from almost 100 modern bird species, scientists have gained new insights into how this color diversity evolved.

Source: Scientists discover how birds and dinosaurs evolved to dazzle with colourful displays — ScienceDaily

recent posts/archive

Alessandro Magnasco (Attr.) and Clemente Spera Attr.) - Landscape with classical ruins and figures

https://darwiniana.com/2018/12/11/as-demand-for-urgent-transformation-intensifies-new-study-shows-hotter-planet-making-extreme-weather-deadlier/
https://darwiniana.com/2018/12/10/climate-talks-open-in-poland-on-somber-note-youtube/
https://redfortyeight.com/2018/12/08/democratic-market-neo-communist-green-new-deal/
https://darwiniana.com/2018/12/08/when-will-humanity-hit-the-peak-of-its-rising-carbon-emissions/
https://darwiniana.com/2018/12/07/degrowth-toward-a-green-revolution/https://darwiniana.com/2018/12/04/nations-must-triple-efforts-to-reach-2c-target-concludes-annual-review-of-global-emissions-climate-action-sciencedaily/
https://nemonemini.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=1767&action=edit
https://redfortyeight.com/2018/12/06/is-revolutionary-transformation-the-only-moral-option-planetary-catastrophe-lurks-is-the-american-public-too-far-gone-to-act-react/
https://redfortyeight.com/2018/12/06/a-question-of-revolution-is-the-united-states-beyond-redemption/
https://redfortyeight.com/2018/12/06/the-problem-with-bolshevism-is-not-that-it-was-communist-but-that-it-wasnt-communist/

https://darwiniana.com/2018/12/06/the-eonic-effect-intro-to-whees-capsule-version-history-and-evolution/ Continue reading recent posts/archive