A fatal confusion has arisen from the failure to critique darwinism: climate denial is equated with critiques of darwin’s theory (with the further confusion of ‘evolution’ with darwin’s theory) in the minds of many public commenters. Many in this fringe area who know there are problems with darwinism and suspect therefore that scientists don’t always tell the truth use that to cast doubt on climate science.
Nice work guys…
We commented on this yesterday (and we note the links to Salon, another trashy netzine brainwashed by the Darwin Propaganda Machine). This may be a function of the author of the essay: I find it hard to believe that the Alternet staff are unaware of the problems with darwinism after ten years of cross links with this blog. They may be too scared to dissent in public. Continue reading Alternet (and Salon) should stop peddling the fake science of darwinism..///Fake science: Here’s the alarming pseudoscience ecosystem that’s threatening our nation’s health | Alternet…//Salon
This site is a stunning piece: it is hard to believe these experts in genomics are so confused about evolution. Almost a complete summary of the fallacies of darwinism. Continue reading Orwellian darwinism…//What is evolution? | Facts | yourgenome.org
This exchange left me a bit baffled, Proyect must be losing it and was one of the few who was open to Darwin critics and allowed me for years to subscribe to marx mail.
Brave words, but all these ‘big histories’ are obsolete now given the discovery of the eonic effect….they would get fired if they challenged the darwin paradigm…so much for …
Many remember David Hume as a pioneering freethinker who saw through the superstition and sectarian dogmatism of religion.
Source: Intelligent Design and the Logic of Hume’s Skepticism | Evolution News
